In reply to Thomas Martin:
> (In reply to Thomas Martin)
> its not my opinion, its a questions that is to be answered and the results will eithier confirm or support the question why do you thik im doing a questioner?, to get results not a slating... <snip>
You seem to take a very aggressive tone here in response to some constructive criticism about your questionnaire. The other replies do make fair comment about your last question.
In it, you appear to use an opinionated comment to try to influence the replies you get i.e. "given climbing's relatively poor performance coaching". Relative to what? And what do you mean by "poor"? Does this mean that you feel there is little funding to support coaching, or that the coaches themselves are not very good, or that there are not enough coaches available, or what?
Another, more general question for you - do you differentiate between coaching and training e.g. I've been trained as a summer ML and SPA instructor, but neither included any formal coaching (although there may have been some conversations with the instructor which were closer to coaching than training).
Another very minor point - you're not likely to get many responses relating to climbing in the 8-12, and 12-18 categories, but you could end up with many in the 35+ category. Is there any reason you've split up the age groups this way i.e why not have categories for 35-40, 40-45, 45-50 etc?