In reply to Postmanpat:
> I'd like to think that was the explanation but fear that he was actually just bloody idle and a bit of a yob to boot .
I think there's the whole insane/eccentric argument there, that is; if your rich then you're not mad, just eccentric. Therefore it follows that if you're talented, and there's no denying Whillans was, it's amazing what you can get away with. You're not a yob, your disfunctional or a fractured genius etc...
I never met the guy, and I've only ever had 2nd hand stories from people who have, so it's just a theory.