In reply to DougG:
Hmmm. Judith's lived in Findhorn since the early 70s (village, not Foundation) and my mum's lived there since about 1975.
Not sure what it's like now (village and Foundation seem to have settled into a mutual tolerance after some problems in the early days) but even visiting there as a student, I found it a bit creepy. A similar set-up to Scientology in many ways, in that (back then at least) they charged credulous (but reasonably well-off) people a lot of money to take courses that were of questionabe value outside the Foundation's own self-referential system.
It wasn't helped by the suspicions in the village of the founder (Peter Caddy) who was, shall we say, a "colourful" character and, in the same way as L. Ron Hubbard, "massaged" his past quite a bit for the benefit of his acolytes.
Similarly, the Foundation also morphed its ideas and philosophies in the same way as Scientology, but the early claims of giant vegetables and the "Findhorn Garden" etc were based on (a) exaggeration and (b) the fact that the Foundation's garden was previously the village's "night soil" dump, and therefore extremely fertile (so a rational explantion for why things grew better there than anywhere else in the sandy-soiled village).
Go and have a look by all means, but I've seen how the place has developed over the years, and I'm quite cynical about it. They've always been good with the propaganda according to whatever the latest fad is. Now that we're all supposed to be green, it doesn't surprise me that they're pusing their "low eco-footprint" rather than God, then the "Network of Light" and subsequently the talks with elves and fauns that were all the rage in the 70s (when undergraduates spent long hours discussing Tolkein).
They probably are quite "green" in terms of ecological footprint, but that doesn't necessarily mean that everything they do is good.
Cynical Rob