In reply to Mick Ryan - UKClimbing.com:
> (In reply to nz Cragrat)
> I know what you mean. Made me laugh too. Bouldering has been and is very much part of climbing, always has been. But some like to profit from its perceived exclusivity (Simon and co. come to mind....can't blame them).
>
> I can comment I've been there.
>
> Proof is that that the UKB hardcore after or often before they visit UKB head to UKClimbing.com. The statistics show this.
>
> Yes, more bouldering action at UKClimbing.com.
>
> Mick
Mick your comments are probably just another troll, but I can't let bullshit like this pass without comment.
Surely Mick, I would profit more from its 'inclusivity', if you can call the small amount of money I make from bouldering related stuff 'profit'. Is there not regular NWB.com news items featuring on UKC? I think there is one there right now. (maybe you forgot to look?)
The fact is that people like myself and Greg (with Lakesbloc) put a lot of effort into documenting bouldering developments online. If we didn't do it who would? Surely you are grateful that this information is made available?
And as for UKB - we've been over this many times; is it not better that UKC faces some competition (however statistically insignificant, before you start quoting figures at me), that there is some element of choice on the internet. I like UKC (and I read bits of it pretty much every week day), but I also like UKB, and the latter, despite the name is not just a bouldering site, far from it.
(You wind up merchant - made me bite. Note to self, must ignore Mick, must ignore MIck...)