In reply to ahaynes:
> (In reply to JoshOvki) That's going a bit far I'm sure you'd agree - what I'm saying is that it's just a good idea to eliminate as many single points of failure as possible. I agree with the subsequent post that the harness and rope are also SPF, but these are easily checked from the ground. These items when used on a top rope route aren't going to take too much strain on a fall anyway because of the amount of rope in use; lead is another matter as I'm sure you appreciate.
I think he's just pointing out the absurdity of adding redundancy where it simply isn't required. Worry about the important things... checking knots, doing up harnesses, attentive belaying, heels behind ropes etc. Not about frequently inspected equipment working at <10% of it's rated capacity.
Are there any (worldwide I'd expect a few to be honest) cases of a belay krab failing or releasing a toprope at a wall?
I'd also contend that the rope cannot be checked easily in most walls. If each end only just reaches the floor (common) then it's very awkward to inspect the rope without pulling it.
There are plenty of risks associated with indoor climbing... failing belays must be somewhere near the bottom of the list.
jk