In reply to i.munro:
>
>
> I'm sorry but this argument is ridiculous. By extension you're arguing that there's no difference between climbing a route & smashing it apart with a hammer because they both cause damage.
> There is a difference. In the latter case you are deliberately & avoidably spoiling many, many other people's enjoyment.
>
> Refusing to clean shoes (along with chipping & drytooling at established venues) are all the behaviour of a small child who, instead of just taking a sweet from the shared bag, throws it on the floor so nobody else can have any. That's why it makes people so amgry.
>
> FWIW if some knob were to react to a reasonable request (however phrased) with violence as gethin-allem suggests I for one would be wading in to defend the OP.
Obviously a hammer is a bit extreme as that causes extensive damage. But just climbing the rocks erodes it more than natural weathering would. Most rock climbers can be quiete arrogant towards the sport and what they think they have the right to do... placing bolts, chalking holds, eroding rock etc.
I'm not saying you shouldn't clean your shoes and try to preserve routes (I agree with that completely), but for someone to scream at people to clean their shoes is a bit over the top, i'm sure if you educated people then they'd be more than happy to wipe them. Did anyone ask the people to clean there shoes or is this just another case of having a rant on UKC but no one was actually informed at the time. I bet it's probably the latter.
I bet there are plenty of non climbers out there who feel we are ruining the rocks just by being there, did you think that you may be spoiling their enjoyment before wiping chalk all over the rock, placing bolts, breaking flakes etc?