/ NEW ARTICLE: How to tie in to the rope
The most commonly used knots are the 're-threaded figure-of-eight' and the 'bowline with stopper'. Here's how to tie them.
Read more at http://www.ukclimbing.com/articles/page.php?id=4755
Please someone tell me that is a photoshopped picture?
If I remember right (and I often don't) I think that was from an old BMC poster, and I think Alan James may be the photoshopper responsible.
It was part of the "Check or Deck" campaign
> you've left a long enough tail without leaving a loose end flapping around."
Eh, why? If the stopper knot isn't necessary at all, why is it necessary to ensure it is snug to the fig-8?
Phew, I was worried that there was some really bad taste going on or a very magnanimous allowance of the use of a photo by a bereaved loved one.
One of my rules for staying alive is to never interrupt tying in for anything, until the knot is fully tied.
Equally, don't talk to anyone else whilst they are tying on.
> and it can't create a loop that can catch on things/be accidentally clipped into an extender.
I guess so, though those are very minor points. An advantage of having the stopper knot an inch or two away is that at a glance it looks like a fig-8 and a separate stopper knot and at a glance you can see that everything looks right (in the photo in this article with them snug it is slightly harder to see that). This might be an equally minor point, but I've usually had the stopper knot an inch or two away from the fig-8, and I've never come to grief over it.
Some of the best photos detailing how to tie knots that I've seen
Whilst floor walking I've found a fig 8 with a 2 turn stopper against it to be a knot pairing I've always found easy to recognise but that may just be owing to familiarity.
I think one of the main points of the article is to use a buddy system and ensure your partner can recognise when what you have tied on is correct, or not.
How the heck can you tie a stopper knot with only 10cm....
A stopper knot on a 10.5mm rope uses 30cm of rope.
Some of the skills/tips/tricks taught in these articles is very useful but considering that pretty much any climber who has done more than a session at a climbing wall will know how to tie a fig 8 is this article not encouraging people who haven't got a clue to go out and give it a go without any real instruction. From this article they may be able to tie a fig 8 but then may get into a whole load of other trouble once off the floor.
perhaps there should be an extension/emphasis to the disclaimer "Being able to tie either of these 2 knots correctly isn't enough to keep you safe at the wall or crag"?
At least suggesting that anyone starting out should really try and get some guidance from someone experienced. And yes I know that many old-school climbers got on fine with just their mothers washing line and some grit and determination but a fair few of these people had plenty of close shaves doing things this way.
Not all climbers start on a climbing wall. Plenty still come into it the old skool way through the love of walking and scrambling.
Also the technicalities of gear placement are a lot more intuitive than the technicalities of knot tying.
I think you've misunderstood - 10cm is the safe minimum length of tail required for the knot to be safe (most if not all knots will allow some rope to slide through as they tighten) not how much is needed to tie a stopper knot. The stopper is an optional extra, if you like, when using the rethreaded fig-8. Maybe I need to rewrite that to clarify though?
I agree that buddy checking is probably the most important thing, it's something I do almost automatically these days.
That's a very good point Gethin. I'll ask UKC to add something along the lines you mention.
When I wrote the article, it wasn't aimed specifically at novices, more as a reminder, update, call it what you will, for all climbers (including myself) to remind us why we do things the way we do.
I think it's a useful article because not everyone finds it easy to learn or process info when shown or instructed by someone else. Some do better by exploring and trying out for themselves, others can pick stuff up best by reading about it.
Reminders are welcome to most I think, I do remember getting to the top of a route indoors at the foundry in Sheffield and only noticing as I clipped the double crabs at the top that I was only tied in to a leg loop.
Why not have a final photo of both knots properly snug and tight?
One thing I always do is to give the rope a good heave once I've tied in - the tug is good enough to feel the resistance in both the rope and the small of my back. I then visually check the knot again. Helps ensure that I've not done something too stupid like misthreading the rope through the harness or itself.
Obviously in the buddy system they can do this as well.
First thing that sprung to mind, assuming I was somewhere fairly solid and had a krab handy, would be to tie some sort of knot on a bight with one hand and clip it to the belay loop.
But that said, the belay loop itself would mean that both bits of the harness are actually attached to the rope in a sense, just with the risk of going over backwards. So, so long as you were sure it was tied in correctly to the leg loops, steadying yourself on the rope to avoid going over backwards would presumably suffice. But it wouldn't have been nice if you'd taken a massive lead fall, it would most probably have resulted in going upside down and headbutting the wall.
I haven't done that, but I did once only tie in through the waist belt. That wasn't very comfortable, but it wasn't until I reached the floor on being lowered that I noticed why.
What are thoughts with a figure of 8, on tucking the tail back through the knot rather using a stopped knot?
It seems slightly better as the figure of 8 tightens on the end stopping it untie, also my stopped knots always untie, as I haven't left enough tail or am bad at tieing them.
Actually, I don't agree. I think it's more important to tie in correctly, and check that you have done so (by using the buddy system) than to suggest people use a method which makes things marginally better if they mess things up.
This view is perhaps not universal within the mountain training community, but it appears to be the most prevalent (at least within those that I consulted with when researching the article)
I'm a self-confessed knot-nazi (ghastly phrase, but it serves). For the Fig 8, picture 5 passes (albeit sans stopper), but 6 and 7 do not because they don't lie evenly.
IMHO one of the reasons people struggle to unitie Fig 8 knots is that they tie them so that they don't lie evenly and the strands cross over, in which case you can't break the knot to loosen it.
Again IMHO, the knot should look the same, every time. If it doesn't something's wrong. That thing might be trivial, but at least you're looking for something. It takes no more time to tie a good knot than a poor one.
The problem would have come if I'd fallen as at best it would have had me dangling around upside down. If I'd had gear I could have clipped another crab through the knot to my belay loop but you don't carry gear indoors.
Someone's probably done it.
The link at the end of the article takes you to the BMC website. Use the tabs to choose your area of interest (e.g Rock Climbing, Mountaineering). You can narrow down your search by then selecting the "Gear" tab. Here you'll find videos, articles and downloads.
I fully agree with you that partner check (or buddy system - sounds like more American? :-) is essential, whatever knot or tying method you use (so do I!). However that does not put the tying method irrelevant.
I believe anything that reduces a risk, even if marginally (unless it is an awful lot more troublesome or time-consuming), helps make the bet of survival (or safety) in favour of you in climbing.
My attitude indeed saved my life more than once in my climbing career (though not this tying method, fortunately - I am not keen to test it!).
The tying method to the harness is one of those that reduce a risk, if marginally, then I regard it as relatively important.
Indeed I have once spotted an instructor tying to only the leg loops, because he threads from the bottom and because probably he was absent-minded or distracted while tying in. The latter is of course a more serious problem and we should avoid it by all means, but we all know that can happen one odd day. Then, when there is a better method that may improve the situation, why don't you use it?
I also note it could have been worse - there is a non-negligible chance of threading a rope via a small webbing to keep the rope in the centre of leg-loops (which definitely would not cope with even the body weight, except for ultra-overmade and well-thought Metolius SafeTech harness). It can happen whether you thread the rope from the top or bottom. However, if you thread from the bottom and if it happens and if you forget to thread the rope to the waist belt, the consequence is equivalent to not tying a rope to the harness at all!
In reply to Dan Middleton, BMC:
I can tell you why I don't thread top down. Its because its too bloody awkward. I've tried it after a mistake tying into a leg loop only but now I've reverted to bottom up threading because I find the liklihood of mistying the knot more of a factor for me.
That's a fearsome photo! I'm glad it's not real
There are plenty of very experienced, very safe and knowledgeable climbers who thread from the bottom up and donīt partner check either. We prefer it that way.
Everyone who has been killed or injured due to a lapse in concentration tieing in left the ground with complete confidence in their ability.
Accidents happen but we can take steps to minimise the risk.
He clearly wasnīt.
I really hope you never have to regret that statement.
It's not a case of right or wrong - I just happen to believe that the focus should be on getting tied in correctly in the first place, and then checking it (either self or buddy), rather than using a method which gives you some redundancy if you stuff it up. By all means thread downwards, I just don't think it's that important relative to the other issues.
One thing I have noticed, is that the proportion of my climbing partners who buddy check each other is slowly increasing. I think this is probably the single most useful increase in safety since I began climbing.
That Sir, is a very stupid thing to think, say and put in print.
No, they were both considered and reasoned statements, if you and Muppetfilter donīt like it then that is your problem.
As I mentioned before I truly hope you never have to take a phone call from a distraught friend who has just stood by and watched someone fall from the top of a wall. As you can appreciate it was a situation none of us ever wants to have to do....
(I will not go into further detail on this out of respect for the friends of the deceased)
I get to see a lot of accident investigation documents in my job, the single common factor in most is an oversight in a simple operation. Dangerous tasks are always approached cautiously and the risk assessments by those involved are thorough. Routine tasks are not always done with the caution they should be and incidents and accidents can and do happen.
The climbers that are most frequently involved in accidents are experienced and competent and make small critical errors and get caught out. A second line of defence like the buddy check can catch an un-done buckle or incorrectly tied knot. Ropes rarely get cut, crabs rarely break but people DO make mistakes.
> As I mentioned before I truly hope you never have to take a phone call from a distraught friend who has just stood by and watched someone fall from the top of a wall. As you can appreciate it was a situation none of us ever wants to have to do....
> (I will not go into further detail on this out of respect for the friends of the deceased)
> I get to see a lot of accident investigation documents in my job, the single common factor in most is an oversight in a simple operation. Dangerous tasks are always approached cautiously and the risk assessments by those involved are thorough. Routine tasks are not always done with the caution they should be and incidents and accidents can and do happen.
> The climbers that are most frequently involved in accidents are experienced and competent and make small critical errors and get caught out. A second line of defence like the buddy check can catch an un-done buckle or incorrectly tied knot. Ropes rarely get cut, crabs rarely break but people DO make mistakes.
If you donīt want to discuss particular incidents then in future maybe you shouldnīt introduce them into the debate.
As a second line of defence against errors partner checks can certainly be recommended amongst other systems, that I know a large number of people who prefer other ways of doing things is fact. That a previous poster distorted Danīs words to say that partner checks are essential when clearly many disagree (including obviously some of Danīs climbing partners) merely gives the false impression that partner checks are the only way to safely climb.
Some would argue that the apparently ever-increasing number of accidents caused by incorrectly tying on, whether at the bottom or when re-threading on sport routes could be connected with the removal of the emphasis on personal skills and checks and replacing these with an attitude of reliance on others. A recent accident in the U.S where all the members in the group though the other had done the check shows clearly this could be so.
> competent and make small critical errors and get caught out.
Is that actually true? I'd have thought that the climbers most likely to have an accident were novice and inexperienced leaders.
> One of my rules for staying alive is to never interrupt tying in for anything, until the knot is fully tied.
never grab your nuts while tying in. Got it!
Just get out.
Many may disagree with Dans affirmation of a pre climb check, how many of those would disagree that you check before doing something behind the wheel of a car. No one has ever suggested that a buddy check makes climbing safe, it simply offers the chance to catch a mistake and that is never a bad thing.
Far better and more competent climbers than I will ever be have died because of making simple errors. People, even very intelligent, focussed and skilled people, can and do make mistakes.
Your point about personal reliance is a very salient one, but I don't think a buddy check removes any personal responsibility. Rather, it reaffirms the traditional bond of the roped partnership.
Back in the day, if you fell when leading, it was the partnership that was likely to die together. Is this any different? You are a team (unless you are soloing) and look out for each other. The incident you refer to in the US doesn't sound like this, more like a group scenario gone wrong. The buddy shouldn't be any old Tom, Dick or Harry, it should the other person on the rope. If you don't trust that person with your life, then you shouldn't climb with them.
I think far more weight may be attached to the environmental factors than to a supposed diminishment in personal safety awareness. I bet there are very few incidents of simple errors at scary places like Swanage & Gogarth - you tend to triple check everything and watch the leader like a hawk. Meanwhile, at the well bolted crag there are stereos, bare chests and banter, and more likelyhood of being distracted. The climbing wall is like this but even more so.
These are the places where both experienced and novice climbers tend to have accidents - gravity cares not how many years you have under your belt, or how safe you were up till that point.
I think the real message here is whatever system you use or knot you tie, be mindful and don't get complacent. Don't forget to have fun too....
"I don't think a buddy check removes any personal responsibility"
But it does add responsibility over your partner.
I usually do cross check, whenever I've forgotten and I've remembered once they were on the wall I start thinking nervously that if something was wrong it would feel my fault for not cross checking, which is not a situation I like.
Similarly, if my belayer forgot to clip the weight bag on (I'm quite heavy, most people I climb with aren't) and they got injured by being slammed into the first clip and I didn't check, I would feel responsible as well. (This has happened top roping when it's less of a concern, but fortunately not when leading).
Elsewhere on the site
In tonight's Friday Night Video, we see Alex Honnold soloing Heaven 5.12d in Yosemite Valley. The route starts 3000ft above the... Read more
The B.D.V. — short for Black Diamond Vertical — jacket and pants are Black Diamond’s most versatile climbing... Read more
Last year, Finn McCann wrote an article about climbing El Capitan with his terminally ill father Seamus, who had been... Read more
This streamlined, midweight thermal layer has an incredibly speedy moisture wicking ability and dries ultra fast if it gets... Read more
October 21, 2014 – Textile Exchange, a global nonprofit dedicated to sustainability in the apparel and textile industry,... Read more