So this question came up in school philosophy club today and I thought I'd throw it out for further discussion.
The scenario is that 2 people go through their lives making identical 'good' moral choices (we'll keep it simple: not to steal, not to murder, to remain faithful to a partner).
Person A is beset by temptation to act the other way each time such a choice comes up but masters their baser instincts to make the 'right' decision.
Person B makes the same 'right' choice but without being even remotely tempted to act the other way.
Is there difference in the value of their acts?
... not showing 50 replies to this topic ... Register as a New User or login to gain full access to the forums. Registration is quick and completely free. If you are definitely logged on, press Ctrl+F5 keys to reload this page [read more]
Unregistered users can only read messages in the most recent topics.
This topic has been archived, and won't accept reply postings.