In reply to Gman:
> (In reply to Only a hill)
> I'm interested to know your reasons for saying this, as I completely disagree. Have you actually owned and used one for any length of time other than reading reviews by Appleheads?
I don't own one, but my day job involves working with tablets and smartphones so I've used Windows RT fairly extensively.
I was really excited when the Surface was announced; I thought it would be the ultimate tablet. It's great that you love yours, and I think they have huge potential, I just think the current implementation falls short for the majority of customers.
Why is that? Windows RT can't run traditional Windows apps, only apps in the store, which is abysmal. I used to have a Windows Phone and the app store was pretty bad for that as well, but it's even worse for RT. Most of the apps are repackaged web views and the (very few) good quality apps are nowhere near as fully-featured as the Android or iOS equivalents. Stability is also an issue all too often with RT apps.
If the app store was up to scratch then the Surface tablets would be formidable, now that the second generation has fixed the hardware issues of the first models. Apps aren't important to everyone but most people need the essentials and there isn't even any way to access your Google Calendar on RT (that I know of). Plenty of other tablet fundamentals are also missing, and in the eyes of most customers that's a big deal.
For example, I couldn't use RT because all of the Metro text and HTML editors are abysmally bad (I've tried them all).
Rumour has it that Microsoft is planning to merge RT and Windows Phone, which might bring some cohesion to the platform. I don't think it's ready for prime time just yet but maybe in a year or two it will start to come into its own. Right now most customers will simply invest their money in a more mature platform with more high quality apps.
> On a side note. Enjoyed your book.
That's great, thanks
If you get the chance I'd appreciate an Amazon review!