In reply to Tall Clare:
> Flipping it round for a moment, what events have taken place to warrant the introduction of this law?
I guess a series of attacks on women by their partners who have a history of violence against women, but the female in the relationship wasn't aware of this.
> I know it's easy to trot out the 'you shouldn't have a problem if you've nothing to hide' argument and that that's very easily dismissed, but in this instance I think it's reasonable to be able to find out whether a partner has a history of violence.
I believe so too! Of course anyone entering into a relationship with someone who has a history of violence or abuse should either be told by their partner, warned by a friend or in this case (which I guess be considered in extremis) contact the police for a report.
> I've a feeling that if someone has convictions for domestic abuse then they're (unsurprisingly!) perhaps not going to be that willing to want to share that with a new partner.
Naturally, my concern is how would this affect the trust in your relationship if you suddenly find out your partner has background checked you (vetted, for want of a better word), when you have no convictions at all. Although I hope any reasonable person would require significant cause before taking that route. I just see this as open to potential abuse.