/ Poor quality news reporting - accident at The Roaches
I found that the story they wrote, appears to be accurate (I'm unaware of the facts surrounding the incident, other than what has been reported)
However they report the incident took place at The Roaches and posts a picture of nearby Ramshaw Rocks. I understand that it may be impractical to get a photographer to the venue, at the time of the rescue. However should a paper such as this not have stock images of the correct location (particularly when The Roaches is one of the busiest attractions in Staffordshire) or alternatively found a bystander who will have taken a picture?
The paper also poses the question on their Facebook Page,
"Do you think more needs to be done to monitor climbers?"
I am undecided why they would pose this question, because they would like a debate on the subject or because they are looking for grater interaction on their post? (Granted my post on here may aid that)
Your thoughts welcomed.
Local newspapers are struggling - loss of revenue due to lower sales and people getting their info from the web. They need to get visits to their web pages to get views for the advertisers so they create artificially antagonistic viewpoints or questions for discussion. The common one round here (Skipton) at the moment is the "war between motorists and cyclists".
Having the details of the story being accurate is a bonus.
I understand and appreciate the pressures of business and empathize with the pressure of needing to get stories out quickly and keep up with online media. However I feel that the detail in a story are important, particularly if it gives people a heightened awareness of a particular area that may be dangerous.
I'm a snapper for a local paper. They have a few stock photos of local areas that I've taken, but stock photos or otherwise, they still cost them money. Unless a paper has staff photographers & many don't, it's gonna cost then per job. That said, there's no excuse really for them to use a photo of the wrong place, just sloppy.
I struggle to see a real issue with this. In what way do you think the photo is dangerous?
It's elf n safety, innit?
I don't feel the photo is dangerous; I feel that using a photo of the location of an incident will help raise awareness of a location that some one has sustained an injury. If this prevents some one from repeating the same mistake or similar that has to be a positive thing.
Just read the article and I was also enjoying the use of the term "free climbing" where I suspect they may have meant soloing, although this is unclear.
Elsewhere on the site
Nuts, wires, stoppers, chocks, wedges, whatever you want to call them, have been around for a long time. Initially made from... Read more
Every so often you meet someone in climbing that makes you take a step back. Someone with a fire in their eye, passion in... Read more
A pack designed for year-round ascents. Super light, flexible, strippable and seasonally versatile you can rely on this perennial... Read more
Pete Whittaker has flashed the 32 pitch route Freerider 5.12d on El Capitan in Yosemite Valley over three days,... Read more
Manchester Climbing Centre is showing Reel Rock’s Valley Uprising on Tuesday the 11th of November at... Read more