In reply to Douglas Griffin:
> Also - even if the place is rebuilt from the original plans, it'll no longer be the same - it'll be a replica.
The very rare quality the GSA has is that it has absorbed and somehow displays the emotional patina from the student who have passed through its doors over the last century. As a student, I didn’t really appreciate how good a building it is…which is pretty poor considering I was studying architecture! It’s only with hindsight and hopefully by gaining a certain intellectual / architectural maturity that I can suggest that the quality of both the external elevations and the interior spaces is second to none IMO.
Every wee nook and cranny gets adopted by the students and made their own; so many spaces are totally bespoke as is every detail you can imagine, whether it’s a window, a light fitting, a door handle, a cabinet drawer an exposed truss etc. Some might find it all a bit OTT and overpowering, but when you consider the quality of design of every element of the building, the whole is so much more than the sum of its parts.
You’re right about it possibly ending up a ‘replica’. I suppose it’s like the classic car restoration argument. How much of the original do you need for it still to be the same object? Having said that, many repairs have already been done over the years to the building so I hope that enough of the physical wear and weathering which help make it so great hasn’t been completely lost, in a year or two it’ll be as good as ever. Here’s hoping.