In reply to Jack B:
> ... It gives better handing and control.
Well, in controlled condition of the kind that exist on race tracks, and do not exist on public highways, they might.
Many of the good things that you get from a tyre when driving on public roads, and especially unseen roads, come from the sidewall. Less sidewall, more problems.
Narrower tyres with larger sidewalls provide the following.
- Ride quality
- Resilient steering feedback less affected by lack of compliance
- Compliance (with the road surface in uneven conditions and ice or snow)
- Shorter water clearance path
- Protection from rim damage
- Probably lower cost (which can be substantial for popular sizes)
- Less susceptibility to tyre wear problesm through misalignment
The principal disadvantages of this approach are the rim diameter limiting the size of the brake disc you can fit and heat dissipation.
Limited brake disc size is especially problematic if you use normal aftermarket brake pads that are fit for nothing. High quality brake pads are £100 so it can be difficult to understand why people spend £1000 on bigger rims and fragile tyres. Heat dissipation is rarely a problem in the UK but in warmer climates you have to be careful about how well the tyre-rim combination dissipates heat. Having your tyres melt can be a bit of a problem on the basis of both safety and cost.
The choice of rim width is crucial. Traditionally, a rim width of 80% of tyre section width was seen as being a good choice from a handling point of view. BMW will be higher and many will be lower.
For the last 40 years I have been using modified road cars with narrower tyres as part of the plan. The rim/tyre ratio is always over 80% and is currently over 90%.
The UK has a particular reputation for car specifications with large rims and wide low profile tyres. The main reason for it is sell more expensive tyre to dim susceptible people who are willing to buy into racetrack chic.
Unfortunately, insurance companies understand as much about this as police officers. Nothing.