In reply to Michael Gordon:
> I was under the impression that the Scottish ethic was generally not to remove pegs but not to replace them either - just let them get worse, fall out and the routes get harder over time. (The idea presumably being that if they're frowned upon for new routes, then there should be a gradual 'natural' phasing out of them on established climbs also.)
I don't think there is a unified Scottish ethic on replacing old pegs with new ones. If nothing else, this thread shows quite a variety of opinions on the matter.
New pegs definitely still get placed (off the top of my head, I remember Dave MacLeod placing one on one of the islands somewhere in that "7 new routes, 7 islands, 7 days" film.) I expect there are quite a few similar examples in Scotland in recent years that just don't happen to be in a film I saw.
I don't think pegs are nearly as divisive as bolts. At the end of the day, pegs are still a way of placing gear, rather than "manufacturing" a protection point where one doesn't exist.
I also feel like the placement of pegs is more under control. It's a very small number of very specific placements on a few routes, unlike the sort of out-of-control bolting of whole sectors that goes on.
(A quick trip to some popular routes in the dolomites is a good way to see loads of agressively unnecessary pegging though! (Which is not to disrespect that particular ethic in that particular area - I enjoy clmbing these routes very much))