In reply to Ferret:
> Just a thought, but I'm generally pretty dubious of changing vehicles purely to save money on fuel. Fine to look at fuel economy if you are changing anyway for other reasons but if current vehicle has life left in it there's a good chance that keeping it and accepting higher fuel costs is still cheaper than changing to a newer and faster depreciating van?
> Say you do 20,000 per year... at 37mpg that's roughly 2457 litres per year, if you get a van (big if) that actually does 50 mpg that's 1820 litres per year... difference is 637 litres which is about £700 per year at 110p per litre.
> So - do you do 20,000? More/less? And if you actually get that possible fuel saving does £700 per year make it sensible to spend money now on a newer van or even worse, take out finance and pay interest on the privilege?
> I'm a big believer in better the devil you know and putting off replacements as long as sensibly possible. Unless current van needs lots of work doing or is utterly unsuitable for the new job/mileage expected I'd probably keep it. Buy a new one and you'll likely spend at least as much maintaining it, doing a few odds and ends that need doing etc to bring it up to scratch/do all the stuff the previous owner left as they were getting rid of soon and save not terribly much on fuel in the scheme of things.
Good advice. I run vehicles until they become uneconomical to repair, then give them away or scrap it. I was born near Yorkshire which may explain.
MPG? My trusty work van has 135 000 + on the clock. LPG dual fuel 40+ mpg at 58.9 p a litre. work it out!
Only repair apart from tear and tear bits, an external temp sensor, £4.95 from ebay and 30 seconds to fit.
Mind you I have had a few bummers in 44 years of happy motoring so you get lucky occasionally.