There are some issues that have been coming up with bolt hangers being positioned as shown in the picture posted by Fraser.
One report involved a climber taking a relatively short fall on a bolt that did not have the hanger oriented vertically but at some angle (undetermined at this point). The way the bolt was clipped caused the load to transfer from the top carabiner into the hanger further from the spine and more towards the nose of the carabiner. The carabiner failed and the climber fell significantly further but only had some minor injuries. The carabiner was returned to the manufacturer and they concluded that the carabiner failed in a way that is consistent with a dynamic load close to the nose. I haven't found any literature that defines the hanger orientation or as you mention the force required to move the hanger if it is placed vertically. It also seems apparent that if the top biner is clipped so that the gate is positioned towards the bolt head side of the hanger then the loading would be more in line with the carabiner spine. Although this wouldn't matter if the bolt hanger was oriented vertically.
Petzl seems to illustrate different approaches in their literature so it is unclear to me what they recommend but I get the point made above regarding the alignment of the hole and bolt.
Petzl's vertical hanger illustration:
http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p128/512dude/Untitled112.jpg
Illustration showing load further from carabiner spine on in correctly oriented hanger:
http://s127.photobucket.com/user/512dude/media/Untitled111%20copy.jpg.html
In the image below, if the top biner was clipped with the gate facing right the load would be more in line with the spine.
Typical hanger installation with quick draw attached:
http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p128/512dude/BCLPiD5CMAAeNey.jpg
Hanger and carabiner showing potential two point loading:
http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p128/512dude/biner.jpg
Post edited at 17:00