In reply to jcw:
> What I would however note, whilst accepting it as part of that evolution, was that climbing was a single church back in 1966 and its fragmentation has been detrimental to Alpinism which was an extremely vibrant scene amongst all ranks and abilities until the early 80s. Ii is here I personally regret that things ain't what they used to be,
This sort of thing is not limited to climbing - as with so many other things, the spread of affluence and leisure time to more and more people means that previously élite pursuits that only the well-do to, the poor but gifted or the very determined could enjoy now get taken up by the masses. When that happens, things change and that upsets some who hanker after the days when things were maybe more exciting and focussed and the oiks couldn't interfere or mess things up too much. The steadily growing number of exceptions à la Whillans and Brown, whose successors were probably still somewhat of a pioneering group in the ' 60s and '70s have since become the mainstream. Pioneering is always fun but it can't last for ever - that's maybe the thing that some people miss.
Even Satan himself gets p!ssed off by this and hankers after 'the good old days' as can be seen from reports of a very sniffy speach he gave to the annual banquet of trainee demons one year:
"Your dreaded Principal has included in a speech full of points something like an apology for the banquet which he has set before us. Well, gentledevils, no one blames him. But it would be in vain to deny that the human souls on whose anguish we have been feasting tonight were of pretty poor quality. Not all the most skillful cookery of our tormentors could make them better than insipid. Oh, to get one's teeth again into a Farinata, a Henry VIII, or even a Hitler! There was real crackling there; something to crunch; a rage, an egotism, a cruelty only just less robust than our own. It put up a delicious resistance to being devoured. It warmed your inwards when you'd got it down. Instead of this, what have we had tonight? There was a municipal authority with Graft sauce. But personally I could not detect in him the flavour of a really passionate and brutal avarice such as delighted one in the great tycoons of the last century. Was he not unmistakably a Little Man -- a creature of the petty rake-off pocketed with a petty joke in private and denied with the stalest platitudes in his public utterances -- a grubby little nonentity who had drifted into corruption, only just realizing that he was corrupt, and chiefly because everyone else did it? Then there was the lukewarm Casserole of Adulterers. Could you find in it any trace of a fully inflamed, defiant, rebellious, insatiable lust? I couldn't. They all tasted to me like undersexed morons who had blundered or trickled into the wrong beds in automatic response to sexy advertisements, or to make themselves feel modern and emancipated, or to reassure themselves about their virility or their "normalcy," or even because they had nothing else to do. Frankly, to me who have tasted Messalina and Cassanova, they were nauseating. The Trade Unionist stuffed with sedition was perhaps a shade better. He had done some real harm. He had,not quite unknowingly, worked for bloodshed, famine, and the extinction of liberty. Yes, in a way. But what a way! He thought of those ultimate objectives so little. Toeing the party line, self-importance, and above all mere routine, were what really dominated his life.
But now comes the point. Gastronomically, all this is deplorable. But I hope none of us puts gastronomy first. Is it not, in another and far more serious way, full of hope and promise? Consider, first, the mere quantity. The quality may be wretched; but we never had souls (of a sort) in more abundance."
(C.S.Lewis *Screwtape Proposes a Toast*)