In reply to summo:
> So when we talk about Labour policy changes and manifestos they are meaningless claims post election, but when brextieers talked about the NHS & £350million they should be held to account for their lies? Another referendum etc.. cake and eat it?
There is an obvious difference between the two. Plus, of course, I didnt say I particularly liked that viewpoint. However you only need to look back through this thread and some of the others to see people rabidly defending the right of MPs to do as they please and leave it to the next election to take care off. I am sure the only reason you didnt attack this view earlier with such righteous indignation is that you missed it and not that they were also arguing against Corbyn,
> I'll give you one wee things to get on with, Trident.
The policy hasnt yet changed. It has been suggested that the policy should be reviewed and that is ongoing as far as I am aware.
Now come on. Where are these far left policies (which incidently nuclear disarmament isnt) you keep ranting about them so it really shouldnt be hard to produce some.
> A bit like the 350m for the NHS, Corbyn has spent the money saved on Trident 3 times over.
I have no idea why you have come out with this. I am guessing its the normal throw some shit and hope it sticks. Nice attempt to put him in the same place as, well, the people the sainted May has put in charge of the EU negotiations.
> Labour conference in militant heartland next week, we'll get to see their peace and love then.
We might. There are some arseholes associated with Labour just as there are with all political parties. However the impression being given is rampaging mobs which so far havent materialised and have come nowhere close to materialising.