In reply to David Martin:
> The rationale for voting Brexit is largely emotional, not based on facts/policy.
No it wasn't.
> Can I give you a sincere thank you for serving Boot Rock his ass on a plate?
Hardly!
> Like many of his arguments, this one was total BS and just took a little Googling to find out that "People have been locked up for less" is complete hogwash. More like "One guy was fined for doing something' a lot more serious. "
Oh my! Sorry for using a simple Google search to go and find information instead of regurgitating the same rhetoric, heaven forbid someone to go against the circle jerk and try and find information to make an opinion.
Classified information is classified information, regardless of how it's leaked, who it's leaked by and under what circumstances. Politicians need more accountability. And I can't stand to hear you lot and the media gob off like Clinton is some saint sent to stop the tyrannical trump.
Want to know why trump has support? Look at the latest growth of the far right political movements in Germany and Europe. Protest votes?
People sick of regressive left wing politics and lying manipulative politicians with no accountability?
Fed up with broken, corrupt and unrealistic political systems. Disillusioned and losing faith in the people who are supposed to be leading the country and the people.
> Almost everything that Bootrock writes is some level of easily refuted BS.
Hardly, is she not under investigation?
> The only reason every point he makes is not pinned down and exposed for the ridiculous propaganda that it is, is because most of us are just too busy
Lol. Propaganda. Have you seen some of the stuff you liberals push out? It's funny how it's always the opponents that use propaganda, not the people you support.
At least I can see both sides and can appreciate more than 1
That's the problem with you regressive left, you only agree with free speech and opinions if you agree with it. Otherwise it's "propaganda". I even admit trump is a total bellend. But still you don't want to hear you don't like.
I like debate. I like opposing views. It strengthens or changes my opinions. But you regressive left liberals hate it. And when you hear something you don't like, you go on the attack.
> I wonder how much trouble the UK politicians such as John Prescott that were running off the shelf cell phones without even changing the default voice mail password would be in if the UK applied the same standards as are being applied to Hillary Clinton.
A lot I hope.
> There's obviously a desire from politicians in the UK and US to have communications not using official equipment because they are scared that their every word will be archived and used against them 10 years in the future and this is leading to terrible security practices.
And why shouldn't politicians be accountable for their actions and words? You lot just went mental over a clip of Trump 10 years ago, and now you advocate politicians having deniability?
Post edited at 14:22