Rockfax Description
The central line is also poorly protected. © Rockfax
FA. Jim McCall 1998.
User | Date | Notes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Dr Avid | 22 Jun, 2005 |
Show βeta
βeta: a nice easy solo..... | βeta? | |
Show beta
βeta: a nice easy solo..... |
||||
AJM | 4 Nov, 2004 |
Show βeta
βeta: Its not 8m, I'll agree on that, I preferred it to the diff on its right, but I wouldn't go for 4a, it wasnt hard. | βeta? | |
Show beta
βeta: Its not 8m, I'll agree on that, I preferred it to the diff on its right, but I wouldn't go for 4a, it wasnt hard. |
||||
Si dH | 31 Oct, 2004 |
Show βeta
βeta: simon caldwell: couldnt agree more. pleasant 4a boulder problem IMO | βeta? | |
Show beta
βeta: simon caldwell: couldnt agree more. pleasant 4a boulder problem IMO |
||||
Simon Caldwell | 27 Sep, 2004 |
Show βeta
βeta: Mr Booker is either a master of sarcasm or needs to get out more! It's more like 4m than 8, and while pleasant emnough is entirely pointless, apart perhaps from getting Mr McCall an entry in the FA list. I climbed the unlisted left side of the slab at a similar grade, maybe I should claim it. | βeta? | |
Show beta
βeta: Mr Booker is either a master of sarcasm or needs to get out more! It's more like 4m than 8, and while pleasant emnough is entirely pointless, apart perhaps from getting Mr McCall an entry in the FA list. I climbed the unlisted left side of the slab at a similar grade, maybe I should claim it. |
Please Login to view more details on the logged ascents
Grade: VD ***
(Stanage Popular)