UKC

Top 100 Posters for 2008

New Topic
This topic has been archived, and won't accept reply postings.
 UKC Forums 15 Jan 2009
Happy New Year to you all!

Due to popular demand, we've compiled a list of the top 100 posters for the whole of 2008.

http://www.ukclimbing.com/forums/info/top100.html

Who will be at the top of the leaderboard in 2009?

See http://www.ukclimbing.com/forums/t.php?t=278089 for last year's discussion.

 Al Evans 15 Jan 2009
In reply to UKC Forums: Embarrasing but not really surprising, the top two posters are both retired!
 Mike Peacock 15 Jan 2009
In reply to Al Evans: Number 53. I think that's acceptable; not too high up, but not too low down.
 fimm 15 Jan 2009
In reply to UKC Forums:

Ah, but if you add the totals for "Tall Clare" and "CJD" together, she comes third!
In reply to Al Evans: Did you see that Bruce Hooker actually wrote more than either of you? At 380,000 words in a year, that is really going some.

Apparently the complete works of Shakespeare comes in at 884,647 words...
johnSD 15 Jan 2009
In reply to Nick Smith - UKC:

I appear to have written 130,000 - just unfortunately on here instead of towards my PhD....

7th in the words/post stakes, suggests I go on a bit sometimes....
 Alyson 15 Jan 2009
In reply to UKC Forums: I hold the coveted 69 position. Ha! Better luck next year you lot!
 Al Evans 15 Jan 2009
In reply to Nick Smith - UKC: Yep I was only third on words posted And the only reason I am n.o 1 is that I always forget something, and then have to do a PS, if we could edit for as long as we can delete I would have far less posts (but I understand why you don't allow that, creative editing could be done)
Al
In reply to UKC Forums: Not i there at all this year which is a good thing I think.
 Nic 15 Jan 2009
In reply to Alyson:

I am tempted to ask if you can hold it for a whole year...
 UKB Shark 15 Jan 2009
In reply to UKC Forums:

Named and shamed. Nick - do you have links to the lists for 06 and 07 ?
 Alyson 15 Jan 2009
In reply to Nic: I'm more than willing to try!
In reply to Simon Lee: Sorry, we don't keep those old pages on the site. You can however still read the old discussion threads about the top 100 posters for each year.

Cheers
 Zygoticgema 15 Jan 2009
In reply to UKC Forums: 65th, I think I can live with that
 doz generale 15 Jan 2009
In reply to fimm:
> (In reply to UKC Forums)
>
> Ah, but if you add the totals for "Tall Clare" and "CJD" together, she comes third!

I'm pretty sure that there are several people on there twice or more!
 Nic 15 Jan 2009
In reply to Alyson:

<splutters>
In reply to Nic:
> (In reply to Alyson)
>
> <splutters>

Shirley that's Alyson's job?
 Tree 15 Jan 2009
In reply to UKC Forums: Haha! Thankfully I'm not in there. Guess I'm not as work shy as I thought I was!
 flaneur 15 Jan 2009
In reply to UKC Forums:

I see niggle and Coel have almost the same number of posts. I wonder why!
 Blue Straggler 15 Jan 2009
In reply to UKC Forums:

Blue Straggler at no. 10 despite hardly posting at all between Sept 6 and mid-December. Sigh.
 waterbaby 15 Jan 2009
In reply to Richard Bradley:
> (In reply to Nic)
> [...]
>
> Shirley that's Alyson's job?

None of you brave enough to ask THE question?
 saz_m 15 Jan 2009
In reply to Touching Centauri:
> (In reply to Al Evans) Number 53... not too low down.

Would it be possible to be too low down? Are you saying that we should be ashamed if we are not in the top 100?!
 Steve Kirman 15 Jan 2009
In reply to UKC Forums:

What's the prize for coming first ?



<double entendre not intended>
 graeme jackson 15 Jan 2009
In reply to UKC Forums: Just scraped at no 100. must try harder.
In reply to waterbaby:
whats THE question
 Blue Straggler 15 Jan 2009
In reply to Blue Straggler:
>
>
> Blue Straggler at no. 10

Actually I like that phrase

<straggles away to plot world domination>
 Cú Chullain 15 Jan 2009
In reply to UKC Forums:

phew, not even in the top 100
 The Bantam 15 Jan 2009
In reply to UKC Forums:

"Top 100 Contributors"? Contributors? Are you sure that is that right word?

 niggle 15 Jan 2009
In reply to flaneur:

> I see niggle and Coel have almost the same number of posts. I wonder why!



We're inseparable, us two.
 waterbaby 15 Jan 2009
In reply to Hannah S:

LOL! Did you read the thread?
 James Oswald 15 Jan 2009
In reply to UKC Forums:
I'm not sure if i'm proud or not with being 17th...........
Clauso 15 Jan 2009
In reply to UKC Forums:

My New Years resolutions for 2008 were very successful. I didn't register in the UKC Top 100 and I finally managed to make love to a real woman.
 Nic 15 Jan 2009
In reply to waterbaby:

<cough>

You mean is she a friend of Arthur Ransome?

In reply to Clauso:
> (In reply to UKC Forums)
>
> My New Years resolutions for 2008 were very successful. I didn't register in the UKC Top 100 and I finally managed to make love to a real woman.

Pulse?
 Alyson 15 Jan 2009
In reply to Nic:
> (In reply to waterbaby)

> You mean is she a friend of Arthur Ransome?

Fortunately I'm still so innocent that many things go right over my head!

Waterbaby - what question would you like to ask? <smiles angelically>
Clauso 15 Jan 2009
In reply to grumpybearpantsclimbinggoat:
>
> Pulse?

Excuse me!?! I may be a little 'left of field' at times, but what the hell do you take me for?

I meant 'real' as in 'lacking an inflation valve' of course.

Bloody sicko.
 Steve Kirman 15 Jan 2009
In reply to Clauso:


Do you get the feeling you are being judged by someone else's standards here...?
In reply to Steve Kirman:
> (In reply to Darren Jackson)
>
>
> Do you get the feeling you are being judged by someone else's standards here...?

Just needed to check, afterall we do not know what limitations to his criteria were in place!

:oP
 waterbaby 15 Jan 2009
In reply to Alyson:
> (In reply to Nic)
> [...]
>
> [...]
>
> Fortunately I'm still so innocent that many things go right over my head!

Oh, my what a waste!

> Waterbaby - what question would you like to ask? <smiles angelically>

<splutters>

I think there was a fair degree of assumption going on, that you couldn't hold your drink

I don't need to ask the question, as I have no interest in the answer!
 Alyson 15 Jan 2009
In reply to waterbaby: Drink? Fond of it as I may be I've never quite thought of it as that!

I can hold most things. If asked nicely.
 waterbaby 15 Jan 2009
In reply to Alyson:

LOL! Couldn't think of another word for it that wasn't too rude

So are we all glad we cleared that up then?
 The Lemming 15 Jan 2009
In reply to Alyson:
> (In reply to waterbaby) Drink? Fond of it as I may be I've never quite thought of it as that!
>
> I can hold most things. If asked nicely.

Hello,

Can I be your friend?

 anansie 15 Jan 2009
In reply to waterbaby:

Tut tut *waggles finger* hee hee
 Nic 15 Jan 2009
In reply to waterbaby:

> So are we all glad we cleared that up then?

Yes, if it had gone over her head you would have had to clear it up...
 waterbaby 15 Jan 2009
In reply to Nic:

Precisely!
 waterbaby 15 Jan 2009
In reply to anansie:

I didn't start it <looks sheepish> I just took it to it's logical conclusion.

Had it been me they were talking about, I'd have had to put them straight, hahaha!
 Alyson 15 Jan 2009
In reply to UKC Forums: John Wood's at number 11 despite being banned since lord knows when. I reckon he'd have been a hot* contender for the number one spot if he'd stayed on Mick and Alan's good side.

I think his ban should be rescinded. I miss him.



*Check it out Gimli - a compliment!
 anansie 15 Jan 2009
In reply to waterbaby:

Hee hee

Didn't understand Any of it myself 0 <-----angelic face .....



;oP
 Alyson 15 Jan 2009
In reply to anansie: <-----angelic face .....


Pfff! You're fooling no-one!

 gingerdave13 15 Jan 2009
In reply to UKC Forums: as suspected 95th in 2007 - and not placed at all in 2008.. phew, getting a new job really HAS helped in curtailing my activities on here..


although i must profess to being dissapointed with the standards/levels of posting. I seem to recall posting about 1500 last time - which if i'd done the same this year would have resulted in about 45/50th. Clearly levels are dropping..

New Topic
This topic has been archived, and won't accept reply postings.
Loading Notifications...