In reply to Ciderslider:
In her defense, she managed exactly as well as you'd expect of someone with no experience. I mean, with that little experience you dont even have the ability to point out the absurdity of the challenge. You wouldnt know to, or how.
Nah, imo the problem comes from the production staff.
You can tell that every year they feel they have to do something even more impressive than the last to get the public attention. So long as it looks hard, it doesnt matter if we see them succeed or suffer. Sooner or later some b-list celeb is gonna end up in hospital because of one of these things.
Usually that'd be ok if it's 'only' something physically gruelling, provided they've been given a good training regime and support. But in this case some halfwit producer seems to have chosen a sport that also requires a lot of technical knowhow and experience, seemingly without even realising it, and then probably just made a load of phonecalls until they found people to get the job done. No matter the cost, no matter how it looks.
It's the looks that bother me. The public perception of climbing is arguably a bit vague anyway, and this doesnt exactly give a representative picture of what's involved. It'd be a shame if it damages the image of the sport in some way, turns off potential climbers or gets someone hurt. Hopefully it'd be the opposite, and be inspirational, but there are better examples of inspirational climbing.
Just give Fran Brown 5 minutes on tv, job done.
Post edited at 21:08