> I have always thought that distinguishing between 'climbs logged' and 'different climbs logged' would be a useful function.
Agreed. There's your logbook of climbs done, and then there is a training record. If a filter could be applied to only show completed climbs it would help as well. It would make sense of the boulder problems logged as worked & did not finish too, but also allow people to record the day they started up a multi-pitch route but bailed due to bad weather.
Well stanage is split into four crags with 25 percent of all grit ticks betweem them. There's more routes there than any other crag but all the majority of the other grit crags have loads of routes as well, even some of the minor crags still have well over 100, so you'd expect more spread, I think a lot of people just go to stanage. Unless there's a lot of climbers out there who go to lots of different crags but call in at Stanage for an evenings soloing which would lead to a lot of ticks. Not that it really matters, I like how you can find a moorland crag with 100 clean routes and have it to yourself.
In reply to Red Rover:
I'm thrilled at the prospect of the race for a million. At present it seems to be between grit (not quarried) and limestone, but if the granites could agree to recognise no differences they could make a late challenge!
> (In reply to Brown)
> That's how I do it as well.
I only log things once, and then only solos or leads. The exception being southern sandstone top roped ascents. I don't log routes I've repeated, seconded or failed on. I'd be much higher than number 13 if I did that!
Good spot. Its part of why I argue UKC includes disproportionate numbers of inexperienced climbers and why Stanage easy VS grades are the most distorted of any heavily voted grades. My log is combined with Moff (with comments on our experience) and part published on 'Offwidth'