In reply to Jonny2vests:
> In reply to Ian Dunn:
> Does it matter how much she weighs? What is her reach? Try and give credit where credit is due rather being cynical and negative.
> It doesn't matter, but maybe it's interesting.
I think the point is that people often use strength to weight ratio to try to explain (and dismiss) why kids do well (certainly happens to my kids a lot) when in fact it's a tiny component.
Reach is a lot more interesting, I often wonder how these kids are getting up adult problems, do they hunt out short guy friendly stuff?
Most of the short person techniques they've used before, you'd think, become less and less useful over 7A?
Post edited at 10:47