Rockfax Description
© Rockfax
User | Date | Notes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
jdkn | 8 May, 2023 |
Show βeta
βeta: Long spacing between bolts throughout and a very long gap from the last clip to the anchor make this otherwise fine route a little nerve-racking. | βeta? | |
Show beta
βeta: Long spacing between bolts throughout and a very long gap from the last clip to the anchor make this otherwise fine route a little nerve-racking. |
||||
jolley | 24 Mar, 2022 |
Show βeta
βeta: Nice route, polished but definitely climbed worse! Quite delicate moves with not always the best hand holds (many of which hidden!), but definitely not 4b like the guidebook suggests. Like many of the climbs on the beach, high first clip, but in this case, easy climbing to it and a nice ledge to stand on. | βeta? | |
Show beta
βeta: Nice route, polished but definitely climbed worse! Quite delicate moves with not always the best hand holds (many of which hidden!), but definitely not 4b like the guidebook suggests. Like many of the climbs on the beach, high first clip, but in this case, easy climbing to it and a nice ledge to stand on. |
||||
Simas87 | 17 Apr, 2019 |
Show βeta
βeta: Polished limestone, slippery footholds with loads of hidden jugs. Local guidebook rates 5b but rockfax says 4b. Feels more like 5b. Bolt spacing is not great, definitely being a light rack to protect. | βeta? | |
Show beta
βeta: Polished limestone, slippery footholds with loads of hidden jugs. Local guidebook rates 5b but rockfax says 4b. Feels more like 5b. Bolt spacing is not great, definitely being a light rack to protect. |
Please Login to view more details on the logged ascents