Chilam balam, media, responsibility and honor

Chilam Balam. I guess most of you have been following the discussion on They way I see it, the discussion has been, for the most part, very good and necessary. The way I see it, a few questions have arisen, such as:
  • Does a climber have any kind of obligation to prove a claimed ascent?

  • Does the climbing community have any right to doubt anyone's word?

  • Is the climbing media supposed to scrutinize suspicious ascents and ask inconvenient questions?

Our sport is based on trust, and if a climber's word isn't good enough, this base would fall appart. However, if you claim to have climbed the most difficult route in the world and has a dubious track record, it's inevitable people are going to ask questions and demand some kind of proof. Barnabé Fernandez knew what was waiting when he contacted Desnivel , claiming his ascent. After all, it wasn't the first time he climbed a controversial route. According to Alexander Huber, he chopped off natural holds when Iker Pou found a new way (avoiding the artificial holds) of solving the crux of Orujo, his 9a+ at Archidona.
One could argue that Barnabé DID prove he could climb the route though. According to photographer David Manilla, Barnabé climbed all the moves in front of his camera during a photo shoot after the FA. If so, one might wonder about the fact(?) that there aren't any photos showing him climb the crux sequence.

Another problem is that there were no rubber anywhere on the top section when Dani Andrada tried the route just three weeks after the FA.

Of course Barnabé doesn't have to prove anything to anyone if he doesn't want to. After all, there are no laws or regulations. But then again, if he doesn't want to make the small effort of doing this, we don't have any obligation to believe what he says. We can believe what we want. Remember he chose the attention when he could have chosen not to tell anyone. If he's climbed the route, this is a sad situation, but he should have seen it coming and thus he brought it on himself.

What I believe?

I'm not convinced either way as there are fairly strong evidence pointing in both directions. I think media has a responsibilty to sometimes be inconvenient, but at the same time it's also extremely important not to let innocent heads roll. This I've learnt the hard way, and I don't want to make the same mistake again.

What do you think?

Photo by David Manilla showing Barnabé Fernandez on 'Chilam balam'

This post has been read 3,312 times

Return to Latest News

Support UKC

As climbers we strive to make the kind of website we would love to visit, with the most up-to-date news, diverse and interesting articles, comprehensive gear reviews, breathtaking photographs and a vast and useful logbook system. As a result, an incredible community has formed around the site - we’ve provided the framework but it’s you who make the website what it is today. If you appreciate the content we offer then you can help us by becoming an official UKC Supporter. This can be a one-off single annual payment or a more substantial payment paid monthly or yearly which includes full access to Rockfax Digital and discounts on Rockfax print publications.

If you appreciate then please help us by becoming a UKC Supporter.

UKC Supporter

  • Support the website we all know and love
  • Access to a year's subscription to Rockfax Digital.
  • Plus 30% off Rockfax guidebooks
  • Plus Show your support UKC Supporter badge on your profile and forum posts
UKC/UKH/Rockfax logo

28 Sep, 2009
"the problem is that some people will always cast doubt. Sometimes for good reasons, but sometimes also for other reasons."Exactly, and if the climber have chosen not to be transparent, there's no way for the media, or anyone for that matter, to know whether the doubt is reasonable or not.
Loading Notifications...
Facebook Twitter Copy Email LinkedIn Pinterest