Loading Notifications...

OPINION - IFSC Livestream Petition: A Worthy Protest

© Eddie Fowke/IFSC

Peter Crane  © Peter Crane
Peter Crane
© Peter Crane
Peter Crane, creator of the ongoing petition to cancel the recently announced IFSC livestreaming subscription deal - which has now received over 5,000 signatures and counting - wrote us this piece on why he is against the IFSC's decision and why he launched the petition. Peter is 26 and lives in Dornbirn, Austria. He is a former member of the Australia National Youth Climbing Team and now works in film production and livestreaming.


When I first heard about IFSC's decision to monetise livestreaming via the FloSports platform, I was seriously confused. I'd never heard of FloSports and after all the talk about the Olympics expanding climbing's reach, it felt like this was a big step backwards. Plenty of people were already sharing their disappointment on social media, but I felt like the message to IFSC would be stronger if we could get people to band together. So I started the petition. It's the first petition I've ever made and I wasn't expecting much. I knew that people like me would want to feel involved somehow.

It's amazing to see how many people have responded in such a short amount of time. There is so much love and passion in this sport. Even in our darkest hours, we show tremendous respect for one another. I'm reminded in times like these how lucky I am to be a climber.

I'm not sure what the petition will achieve. It's still early days and petitions can be hit and miss. I think the most important thing is to stimulate and foster debate. That's the great thing about climbing. We're an honest, open community. IFSC's decision to organise such an important deal behind doors, in my opinion, reflects their ongoing disengagement with the community they're supposed to work with and represent.

Anak Verhoeven checks her stopwatch in the women's final  © Eddie Fowke/IFSC
Time has run out for free IFSC livestreaming

I do know that this will greatly affect IFSC's viewership. The main reason being that not everyone can afford the high fees. Climbing is finally beginning to reach the poorest countries in the world. It's just a matter of time before we're celebrating the first world champions from places like northern Africa or the Pacific Islands – it could be sooner than we think. It will be an incredible shame when some athletes' family and friends can't watch them compete, not even in replays. Competitions have now become less accessible to people around the world – not everyone can travel internationally to physically attend events or afford a costly recurring fee. IFSC has also been working hard to make sport climbing Olympic, which aims to "encourage the regular practice of sport by all people in society, regardless of sex, age, social background or economic status" (Olympic.org).

Even for those who can afford it, the question is "is it worth it?". It's been pointed out that IFSC's live-streaming track record is far from spotless. Event streams will often drop-out, loose audio sync or have one of the other millions of technical issues that come with livestreaming. We'll have to see if IFSC's partnership with FloSports changes any of this, but being the Head of Creative Development of a film production company and being a livestreaming specialist myself, I can confidently say that it's just not that simple.

This might make life harder for those of us who love to watch competitions, but it also effects the athletes who want to compete too. Sponsors often contribute financially for athletes to compete in the hope that their athlete will attract as many eyeballs as possible on the world stage. If viewership takes a titanic hit, sending athletes to comps will be hard for brands to justify.

Shauna Coxsey, Megan Mascarenas and Anna Stöhr  © Eddie Fowke/IFSC
Spectators from afar will have to pay to witness moments like these

I keep coming back to the same question: What could motivate IFSC to make such a decision? Maybe they're naive, but that's why research and open conversations exist. Maybe they thought it would be an easy way to make money, but profit is not what an organisation like that should focus on – not to mention it's just bad economics. Maybe they think this will draw more spectators to the physical venues, but they'll learn the hard way that it doesn't work like that.

We're living in an amazing time, where climbing as a sport is at a tipping point. The decisions we make today will define the sport for years to come. This announcement is purely a selfish one that does not benefit spectators, athletes, climbing brands or the climbing communities that make this sport unique and wonderful.

The petition means a lot to me because climbing has so much amazing potential. Few sports are so inclusive with such a warm, open community. I think IFSC could do a far better job of expanding the sport in a way that nurtures these strong values, instead of degrading them. I feel let down by the people that are meant to be representing us and I'm worried it could soon be too late if I don't try to act now, somehow.



Support UKC

We need your help.

UKClimbing is a vibrant web site with rich content and an amazing community. So far, all we've asked of you is that you visit and interact with the site but we are in uncertain times. We need to look at ways to keep the site moving forward whilst maintaining our key aim of allowing free access to everyone to our main content. The site will continue to be mainly funded by a subtle level of outdoor-only advertising but we now need extra support to ensure we can continue to provide the UKC that we all know and love.

You can help us by becoming a UKC Supporter. This can be in a small way or in a larger package that includes discounted products from our sister-publishing company Rockfax.

If you appreciate UKClimbing then please help us by becoming a UKC Supporter.

UKC Supporter

  • Support the website we all know and love
  • Access to a year's subscription to the Rockfax App.
  • 30% off Rockfax guidebooks
  • Show your support UKC Supporter badge on your profile and forum posts

7 Apr, 2017
I'm surprised this hasn't generated more comments by now. Charging for these events will disenfranchise anyone who is not well off, including thousands of young people just getting involved in the sport, climbers from poorer countries, and casual viewers who might have got hooked if they'd been able to watch. Even as an older traditional climber, I have had huge pleasure watching IFSC competitions, and learnt a lot about technique in the process. I could afford to pay the fee but I won't in protest. The IFSC needs to be adequately financed, but this is not the way to do it. I know indoor competitions aren't to everyone's taste, and IFSC is far from perfect - some might even relish the idea of it pricing itself out of the viewing market. But I believe it's important to maintain common ground between competition climbing and the rest of the climbing community, otherwise it will become a monster controlled exclusively by business interests. I've signed the petition, emailed all the people at IFSC, and re-posted the petition in as many places as I can think of. I hope many of you will do the same.
7 Apr, 2017
Update from Peter Crane: 7 APR 2017 — More than 10,500 supporters later, things are finally looking up. Thanks to our collective voice, IFSC have decided to take temporary measures and re-think terms of the FloSports deal. The World Cup in Meiringen will be streamed for free, but at this point we still have little information on the long-term future of IFSC live-streams. We would like to thank IFSC for taking this very, important first step. It is unfair for federation officials to ignore the community they are here to serve, which is why we hope they will be more transparent in the future. What happens now? Over the next few days. we hope to hear what IFSC's official plan is for the future of live-streaming. With your support, we will continue to fight for fairness and equality for climbers around the world. Thank you all – but remember, we're not finished yet. Peter Crane
8 Apr, 2017
I suspect the only reason is that there are actually several other threads on this topic already. The response has been overwhelmingly against the IFSC's decision. :) Current petition figure is 11,762.
8 Apr, 2017
First well done for starting the petition. I totally agree with this. I'd also add to that list: the people who fork out the money to host the competitions in the first place. Some of that comes from sponsors (separate from athlete's sponsors). If the events only get seen by a small percentage of the current number I'd have thought they're going to be less willing to put money forward, thus possibly jeopardizing the future of competitions themselves.
9 Apr, 2017
"This announcement is purely a selfish one that does not benefit spectators, athletes, climbing brands or the climbing communities that make this sport unique and wonderful." What a load of rubbish, the announcement might have been mis-thought, but having enjoyed watching the IFSC boulder coverage for free for many years, I have always been grateful to the IFSC and thought it was a privilege not a right.
More Comments
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Pinterest