In reply to spidermonkey09:
> That is an extraordinarily generous interpretation. How much clearer could it possibly be?
I don't know, not having read the signs exact wording. Any chance of a photo of the signs?
Some mention of the nearest possible alternative parking could be useful on the signs.
I thought Pete just raised the valid point that misinterpretation was possible.
FWIW, my only visit to Slipstones was in 1971 /2, never felt the need to return. Might have a revisit to see what all the fuss is about.