In reply to Hooo:
> Have to disagree there. I think the problem is that you've seen the dragons and put it on the Tolkein box. I can't be doing with fantasy, especially not Tolkien, but the BG is most definitely not fantasy. It's a deep and magnificent novel. With dragons in it.
Read my comment again and ask yourself if I really did categorise it as fantasy, rather than placing it in an Arthurian realm. It's more in the mode of Gawain and the Green Knight if we're going to get literary.
But it's still yawningly dull owing to the radio play-like simplicity of the dialogue allied to KI's efforts to evoke his amnesiac mist. The problem is, he's too successful in this latter objective and, even as the plot finally thickens, mere pages from the end, I threw the book away out of boredom. The critics haven't been kind overall.
Believe me, I'm a fan. I loved When We Were Orphans and NLMG. But not this last one. It just isn't very good.