In reply to jon:
> Alpine adjectival grades when applied to pure rock climbing routes are a bit of a nonsense - you only have to look at some of the Aiguilles Rouges routes to see this - straightforward non committing rock climbs being given ED... Personally I think D for the Salbit S Ridge is definitely an overgrading when you compare it with death-on-a-stick mixed alpine routes also given D. It's probably a lot safer now than when you did it, with bolts on most pitches and huge glued in rings at every belay.
Thanks for putting it more diplomatically than I could, jon.
I did the s ridge in 75, the day after a , completely out of our depth, wander on the lautaurbrunnen north faces. Up at 1 am , wander, get lost , walk down, drive round , walk up to hut.
A bit bleary eyed, I was disappointed to notice there was a path parallel to the route within a rope length for most of the way, it seemed less committing than climbing on tower ridge or cloggy.
At the hut , we found out that the local guide ran morning and afternoon sessions on it, though that might have been on the easier version of the south ridge.
About alpine grades, its always been a nonsense like you suggest, is there any proposals to sort it out amongst the alpine countries producing guidebooks?