In reply to simes303:
I don't object to comments on price - it's a fair point. Whilst of course Rab, like any other company, has to make a profit on these trousers, I suspect they aren't making ridiculous profits as they are just one step in the chain.
I was thinking about this the other day, I bought a new pair of climbing shoes recently, the shoes were on a good discount - 85 instead of the RRP of 140 and I've used the model before, liked them and know what size would be a good fit. When I got them, a not super important pull on tab immediately came away in my hand. I hadn't been sewn properly on - I suspect that one spool of thread on the sewing machine had just run out, so there was only the top half of the sewing done. I emailed the shop saying it wasn't a big thing but this had happened and they might want to check the batch to see if it was a thing across more of the shoes or just mine. I didn't say I wanted replacements or send them back though as it seemed a waste the money on posting them back but even more so, it just felt like some delivery truck burning more petrol, when I could re sew the tab on by hand in 10 minutes. I got a great email back the next day from the shop (kudos Joe Brown/Climber's Shop) saying they were really sorry, had checked others but hadn't found the same problem and they'd pay for me to ship them back and they'd replace them with a new pair, or I could keep them and they'd sell them to me for cost price. The latter option was perfect, I got them 33 quid back and I sewed the tab on in about 10 minutes by hand. So the cost price for a pair of rock shoes, seems to still be about the same proportion of the full price as it was when I worked in outdoor shops in the 90s. Outdoor equipment has never seemed to have been a big profit industry. So a shop selling these trouser will buying them in at around half of what the RRP, and will pay VAT and other fixed costs out of their half of the RRP. Rab with their half of the RRP has to pay all their fixed costs, manufacturers, employees etc. so take some profit out of that. Their manufacturing partner in China (IIRC) needs to make some profit whilst paying their employees and fixed costs and for the materials used. The nylon and fleece mills, the same - and on it goes back to the oil company bringing the crude out of the ground.
They are really nice trousers for their intended purpose but having said that, if you can't afford them I reckon you'd do pretty well with some Decathlon more basic soft shells and some Decathlon (or Aldi or Lidl) wool long johns underneath at maybe a third of the price. Many ways to skin a cat and all that (NB. no cats were skinned in the making of this analogy or these trousers).