In reply to yorkshire_lad2:
Congratulations n'all that, and anything that gets people out having fun hillwalking is fine by me, but I wasn't impressed by the Ethels as a list. It felt like it was put together by someone who was technologically adept but who didn't know the Peak that well.
For instance:
Chelmorton Low and Sough Top are basically the same hill, with hardly any reascent between them (and Sough Top is in a ploughed field, not just pasture). Ditto Howden Edge and Margery Hill.
Lost Lad, White Low and Ashway Moss are very insignificant tops, and three summits for Stanage is overkill.
Harthill Moor has little reascent and is in a warren of stone walls with no public access, while only a mile away is Anthony Hill, which is higher, more prominent and easy to access (as well as being a much more dramatic summit)
The Cloud is a bit of an oddity as it's well outside the Peak (though a cracking little hill)
If Higgar Tor why not Carl Wark?
If Alphin Pike why not Alderman's Rocks?
Loads of good prominent hills are missed out - Narrowdale, Gratton and Wetton SW Hills near Hartington, Bunster Hill near Ilam, Gradbach Hill near the Roaches, Outer Edge and Horse Stone in the upper Derwent to name a few.
A number of the listed hills have access problems and the list has led to a noticeable increase in barbed wire around them, as where farmers turned a blind eye to the odd maverick bagger they are less tolerant now numbers have increased. I can see why the compiler wanted to include Durham Edge and Lees Moor, both very prominent hills, but several of the minor non-access tops could have been left out with no great loss.
Recommend a look at the Peak 75 list. It's on Haroldstreet, and I think it's available as a booklet too. It includes pretty much everything with 30m drop that's either in access land or close to a right of way. A far better list IMHO.
Happy bagging🙂