UKC

Hive mind- name of a children's book

New Topic
This topic has been archived, and won't accept reply postings.
 RX-78 16 May 2025

I am trying to remember a children's book we used to read to our children in the 2000's. It was a counting book with some strange creatures on rollerskates (?) And one sentence my wife and I remember from the book is 'over the wiggy (or wiggly) bridge'.  We often say the phrase to our kids but they have no recall.of the book. So appealing to the group !

 Andy Johnson 16 May 2025
In reply to RX-78:

Three Billy Goats Gruff?

"Hop and skip, hop and skip, over the rickety bridge."

 Ciro 16 May 2025
In reply to RX-78:

Ah, that sounds like a fun one! The book you're likely thinking of is "Ten Wiggly Worms" by Carolyn Beck and illustrated by Carmen Mok.

It features ten adorable, brightly coloured worms on roller skates who go on an adventure. They definitely go "over the wiggly bridge" as they explore!

Does that title or the author/illustrator names ring a bell? It was quite a popular counting book in the early 2000s, so it fits the timeline perfectly. I hope that's the one you were trying to remember!

2
 Ciro 16 May 2025
In reply to RX-78:

(That was Google Gemini's response to copying and pasting your query)

3
OP RX-78 17 May 2025
In reply to Ciro:

Sadly no, but that looks like a fun book our children would have enjoyed. Thanks for trying!

OP RX-78 17 May 2025
In reply to Andy Johnson:

We had a book with that story but this is a different one, definitely for counting from 1 to 10.

 Luke90 19 May 2025
In reply to Ciro:

Seems like an excellent example of why one should always check the output of an LLM, as the book it confidently describes doesn't even exist as far as I can tell. It's just plausible-sounding nonsense.

 Chris M 19 May 2025
In reply to RX-78:

Could this be it;

https://www.abebooks.co.uk/Uncle-Wiggily-Roller-Skates-Garis-Howard/3220264...

(for reference I used the paid version of ChatGPT)

 Ciro 19 May 2025
In reply to Luke90:

> Seems like an excellent example of why one should always check the output of an LLM, as the book it confidently describes doesn't even exist as far as I can tell. It's just plausible-sounding nonsense.

I should know better 😅

Did you see the recent case of a judge recommending a report to the bar for a legal team who referenced fictitious previous cases in their submission?

 Luke90 19 May 2025
In reply to Ciro:

Alarmingly, I've seen quite a few reports of lawyers submitting AI-generated fictional precedents. And I bet there are a bunch more that have got away with it because everybody involved lazily assumed that the references said what they claimed. On a climbing forum it's amusing, but lawyers dealing with serious cases this way need to be struck off as an example.


New Topic
This topic has been archived, and won't accept reply postings.
Loading Notifications...