In reply to French Erick:
> Do you put much thoughts about your logging? Do you always log? Do you think we should put that info out, or is it spoiling the adventure?
All good questions. I originally logged everything, I then had a few years when I didn't climb much and didn't log it, I'm now back logging nearly everything. For example today's routes were logged earlier.
The minority of missing routes are now disproportionately annoying...
However, things are slightly complicated by the fact I use my original profile under my real name for my logbook but this profile for using the forums. I also can't decide whether to have my logbook public or not. As it happens, I just changed it to public again last week.
I rarely add notes which has possibly been influenced by having a private logbook most of the time. However, I appreciate the notes other make especially with Winter routes. If I keep it public, I way well add more information on routes next Winter.
There is definitely a tension between using the logbook as a personal record and between it being a permanent public record. A certain individuals forty-five attempts (exaggerating lots) on nearly every grade 7 sport route in Dorset don't add much to the logbook database, however their entries are as equally valid as anyone else's.
My approach when reading any comments is to assume that they are primarily there as a personal record and any information relevant to me when researching a route is a bonus. I don't think it particularly valid to consider them worth passing judgement on. In that vein, I think tricadam's opinion that he dislikes some comments but keeps his own logbook private is a bit hypocritical.
Finally, I don't think you can really have too much beta. After all, if you want a pure onsight that much, you're going to avoid reading any of the logbook comments in the first place.