In reply to Sanfairyanne:
Never heard the French term before, but a quick google suggests that they are talking OAC/Skinbased's short skis, which oddly is part of the 'outdoor sports empire' coming out Kangasala central Finland - a slightly bizarre place of origin!
I actually climbed with an American chap a couple of summers ago when I was last there - my wife's family are Kangasala people. He had met a Finn and ended up there trying to find a job, a similar situation to the one I had found myself in 20 years earlier! Alan was working in OACs factory making the ski. Interestingly, a very positively for conservative Finland, OAC have taken on a number of asylum seekers to work for them as well - so if you do use OAC skis, they have probably been made by an American and a bunch of Syrian engineers in small town in the middle of nowhere in Finland! https://www.skinbased.com/
Most people seem to go for the universal binding that you can use with a hiking boot of some description. It does seem that you can parallel them, but in their advertising people seem to tele turn them more. Have you telemarked skied at all?
When I lived in Finland I looked at getting a pair (I think they were still Karhu back then, but same basic design) but they were really quite expensive. I ended up getting Marquette Backcountry "ski-shoes", because mainly, even with import duties from the State's, they were still cheaper and were pre-drilled to take telemark bindings, which I already had. They are heavy but indestructible. I haven't tried OAC skinbased skis to compare, but my impression is they glide much better than the Marquettes. I've used them with plastic telemark boots although I think they were talking about making a universal binding for them as well. I can tele turn mine a bit, but to be honest it easier to get them to parallel. https://www.snapperhead-inventions.com/products/backcountry-ski