In reply to Marmot UK:
>
> It is important to point out that the Driclime Jacket was not discontinued because we thought it old and “uncool”. Retailers had begun to loose interest in selling the Driclime Jacket as softshell styles became more popular in the market place. (This is strange because it always rains in the UK where softshell is useless?)
Sadly, I can believe that. Fashion over function then?
> This change towards softshell was the driving force for introducing the Driclime Catalyst jacket to the range. This gives a more interesting style with a technical story that retailers find more interesting and buy.
Would you care to name these retailers? Also is it not beyond the wit of someone at Marmot to come up with a 'technical story' about the upscaling of the design of the Driclime to include a revolutionary new extremity protection system? (I wouldn't use anything so common as the terms 'pockets' and 'hood'). In one fell stroke you'd be keeping the retailers 'interested' and producing an item that many posters on this thread want to buy.
> This means we can continue to justify making the style of jacket that has now become classic kit status.
It isn't 'classic' kit. It's a jacket that is now nowhere near as good as the old design.
> If you have never tried out a Driclime Jacket then you are really missing out on an excellent bit of outdoor kit.
No I'm not. I'm waiting for another manufacturer to design something I want to buy, rather than compromising and buying something that's going to irritate me.
I hope this doesn't come across as being too negative, but I constantly find myself picking up a garment and thinking "That would be really good if only...", then putting it back on the rack because it doesn't quite do the job. It's not about having expensive, pointless dangly bits or umpteen mobile phone and GPS pockets, or incredibly complex venting systems. I want pockets to put my hands in and a hood to keep my head warm. It's not too much to ask for in a £70 jacket, is it?