In reply to Removed User:
> (In reply to bpmclimb) Oh dear. It appears you are oversimplifying the situation to suit your polarized views.
>
> The OP mentions the 'We've all found the odd thing stuck in a crag, a nut here or there'.
>
> We can thus safely assume he is talking about abandoned gear on route, not gear that was lost/left by accident at the crag.
>
> I am sure you would agree there is a difference.
I would agree there is a difference, and what you do about it is up to you, but I don't agree with your argument around "We're talking about established ethics". It comes down to a personal decision.
If you leave gear you will do so in the knowledge that you probably wont get it back. That doesn't mean that you don't appreciate it when you do get it returned.
I found a cam last week the day after it was left by a second who couldn't retrieve it. A post on Scottish Climbs now means it will be going back to its owner. Under your "established ethics" I should have kept it. I suppose that is the same argument had I been there the same day and successfully extracted the cam when following them up or after they had been forced to retreat and had consigned themselves to abandeoning it. Such "established ethics" would say it was fine to keep it even though they were still there, but had given up on extracting it?
Well, it is a personal thing and most of us are inconsistent in its application, myself included. I'd give it back if I thought I'd have a chance of successfully reuniting the owner with the gear. Had it been a single nut? Well I've often asked people I've know who were climbing at the venue and returned stuff, but not bothered to post or make any attempt to track down the owner further than this. Inconsistent, yes, but I'm not going to argue that there is an established ethic. I aslo see why others accept it as "crag booty".