In reply to Ramblin dave:
> Actually, the CFOTM sort of stuff isn't the main reason for me to avoid cycle lanes. This sort of stuff may be symptomatic of the same root cause (ie a box-ticking "that'll do" culture and a tendency to view cycle lanes as a nice bonus if you can fit them in but not worth messing around with "proper" traffic for)
Agree.
> but the thing that really puts me off is the fact that cycle lanes tend to be badly surfaced
Round here, that doesn't only apply to cycle lanes - the roads are just as bad
Cyclists aren't being singled out for the sh1tty end of that particular stick.
> narrow
I believe the recommended width is 1m, which is basically useless.
> and often shared with pedestrians
In my neighbourhood roadside cycle lanes (AKA "the gutter") are usually shared with parked cars and white vans - most of which are also positioned so as to "share" a proportion of the footway. The fact that it's perfectly legal to park in these cycle lanes makes them utterly pointless.
It really is way past time that the authorities admitted that roadside cycle lanes are a pointless waste of money, and shouldn't count towards cycling provision quotas at any level.