In reply to Moley:
> You mention lack of political will to fix the problem. I quite agree, but this applies to just about any countryside problem that involves killing animals. It's a vote loser, so better to sit on the fence and do nothing - or pass the buck, but the problem doesn't go away on it's own.
> Finding funding is hard, because someone has to put their name to the project, I think they have been working on this for years and only just got it off the ground to employ one full time officer/coordinator for 5 years and money for traps. Should have been done 10 years ago, but we can only do our best.
I totally agree but reducing grey numbers is only part of the issue. with out habitat expansion and improvement across a greater area the Reds will always be struggling. Using Merseyside as an example 20 years ago the numbers of Reds on Merseyside was huge, literally could walk in to the woods, hold your hand out and reds would be dropping out of trees to take nuts out of your hands. Now, there's probably a fraction of that left.
The political will I am talking about is more in relation to fixing habitats to allow the Reds to increase and expand their range naturally. Who know's maybe if we had more joined up habitat those high numbers of reds on Merseyside 20 years ago would have spread out increasing the numbers in West Lancashire and beyond.
What we have now is still an isolated pocket of Reds, that will be hit again by the squirrel pox virus further reducing numbers. Surely by restricting reds to small pockets of woodland is adding to the problem? I am not sure the Greys reduction scheme works long term as they are literally running down the streets here.
I am sceptical of wildlife and habitat protection laws and will in this country. I simply don't believe beyond token gestures we have the will or desire to fix it. If you want depressing read the State of Nature report!!!!