In reply to Removed User:
> so don't put them on until you're free...agreed that the child should be clear that clipping in & out is a grown-up's job (TBH most 4-8 year olds wouldn't be able to work the push/twist/squeeze mechanism anyway), but as the Ivanator advises, build them up.
But then back to my earlier point, that you will annoy other wall users. Clip them in, that's fine, trot off to belay the other youth for however long, meanwhile theres a child hogging the autobelay and potentially not actually using it. Where there's five autobelays, that's probably not an issue, but at smaller walls with one or two, at peak period, when I imagine the group in question will likely attend, it becomes an issue.
> And i'm unclear why a wall would object - i can see that most would want to watch you do it initially to check you're safe at it (a bit like belaying!), but are you suggesting the technique is safe for someone with a CWA to do, but not someone with significant experience?
Sounds like your wall needs a few more auto-belays, Tomtom (or you need to be a bit more inclusive about other people being there?!)
Because unfortunately someone saying 'I have lots of experience' isn't always a guarantee that they have lots of experience, or even more so, actually competent. Although I'd happily debate the standards of the CWA, it is at least the industry recognition of 'experience'.
I can think of many walls that could use more autobelays, my local one being potentially one of them. But I'd rather not see the loss of lead or even bottom rope lines lost for the sake of an autobelay.
Inclusivity is not the problem, ensuring safety of minors under the supervision of someone with unknown experience is.