In reply to Chris the Tall:
> And I don't doubt that she has been subject to racial abuse as a result of the publicity this case has received, which is the other claim he is reported to have made.
That doesn't make her any less responsible for what she did on the day in question, does it? I can see that it would be valid as a plea for leniency in sentencing, which I suspect is why her lawyer saw fit to mention it.
> To be honest I'd rather see this woman banned from driving for 5 years than go to prison
She hasn't yet received her sentence for the offences of 26/08/2016: failing to license a vehicle, driving without reasonable consideration for other road users, and threatening behaviour. I would be surprised if she got prison for that lot - I'd agree that a ban, and a fine/community service for the last one would be more appropriate. However, she is under a suspended sentence for her earlier ABH offence and AIUI this further conviction - especially the threatening behaviour element - could trigger the sentence for that. (It isn't straightforward to find out what that sentence was online, even though it should be a matter of public record. Someone seems to have done a good job of persuading Google to remove references to her from their search results. I'm
sure that's what the CJEU intended...)