Something for forum users to waste time on for about 2 minutes.
https://www.thoughtco.com/use-colored-chalk-to-leave-no-trace-755626
1. climbers leave chalk marks on rock
2. national parks ban used of white chalk, because
a) longterm it damages the rock (in this instance, soft sandstone)
b) it leaves unsightly discolouration (particularly: white marks on red sandstone)
3. In response, companies produce 'nature coloured' chalks: greys, reds etc. eg.
https://www.onsightgear.com/collections/pur-chalk-premium-eco-friendly-colo...
3 addresses 2b but not 2a. The national parks rules say “The use of chalk (calcium carbonate) in conjunction with technical climbing and bouldering is prohibited. A chalk substitute that does not discolor the rock may be used.” Coloured chalks are still chalk.
I'm finding it strange to think that someone would make a conscious choice to buy grey chalk (calcium carbonate) because they imagine themselves to thereby be doing something virtuous. If you're sympathetic to 2b but aren't sure about whether 2a applies – whether the calcium carbonate you're using will damage the rock longterm – why make a choice to use _coloured_ chalk? You could just brush chalk marks away afterwards?
I think I'd be interested in seeing what a popular and chalk-coated crag (perhaps not in a national park or nature spot) would look like if people climbed with a kids'-rainbow pallet of chalks.
Final thought – does it happen in the UK? Are there 'chalk restrictions' which people avoid/evade by using 'nature-coloured' chalk?