I'm staying in Llanberis over the weekend and am looking to get out bouldering, probably at wavelength boulders. Depending on which forecast I look at depends on whether this is possible. A number of them have it as likely raining, a number have them as a low percentage possibility of rain. The question therefore is where do you go for your forecast? What's proved reliable for you over the years.
I usually look at two or three different ones then pick the one I like best...
Awesome, I've found one on accuweather which suits me so I'll disregard the others.
Accuweather’s precipitation forecast feature for the next 120 mins is a handy feature.
I tend to use met office for forecasts beforehand and then their rainfall radar on the day to see what has recently happened. Weather in those Welsh valleys is hard to predict though, and often low cloud will cause mizzly rain on those boulders when it is ok lower down. Porth Ysgo is a long way but I think it is often dry when the Valleys are misty and the rock is amazing. I can particularly recommend "Ugly Women" (6b).
If I'm staying in the area, I use the famed "look out the window" method personally
When forecasts don't match it basically means they don't know when an event is going to happen. Usually all the different forecasts have rain or sun (or whatever) taking place in a 12/24 hour period but just disagree on when. This is just the nature of the unstable weather we having at the moment. Best bet is look at lots of forecasts and then essentially take the average so if more say it will rain at 1200 than dont that is probably the likely our come.
check out Meteoblue and Windy.com. I use these to help out with my paragliding.
I like Windfinder for coastal stuff and Ventusky for its visuals.
> I usually look at two or three different ones then pick the one I like best...
I'm going to make millions out of a "compare the market" weather forecast site.
> Awesome, I've found one on accuweather which suits me so I'll disregard the others.
I had to laugh at this in my newsfeed. Quite the most ridiculous piece of clickbait ever, based on an Accuweahter forecast (note the date in the article ).
Express.co.uk: London snow alert: Exact day capital should expect to be crippled by snow - forecast. https://www.express.co.uk/news/weather/1204885/London-snow-alert-uk-snow-la...
The Daily Express weather forecasts are a disgrace. I dont know how they get away with it. Particularly as weather is so important to people and their lives. Why are we surrounded by such drivel.
Thing is, it’s not the Express making the forecast as such. They rely on meteorologists as much as any other publication or broadcaster, but they do deliberately pick up on the ‘extreme’ end of the modelled forecasts hence the usual ‘worst winter ever’ etc that we see. It’s the weathermen and their machines that put these possibilities out there in the first place, even though most only have a tiny-to-zero percentage chance of occurring.
They use companies like James Maddens Exactaweather and Piers Corbyns outfit. They are cranks.
Because it isnt a weather forecast; its a means to sell newspapers to those easily drawn in by big headlines depicting extremes. There was a thread about this (not just the weather but Express headlines in general). See this;
Anyone with a real interest in the weather forecast will go nowhere near the express.
I have just looked at the link. Its so depressing that we look for these kind of headlines. But You cant have good without bad. So I guess its just one end of the spectrum.
The express weather column is nonetheless about the most truthful bit of the whole shameful rag.
When we went to Skye this year I found that the best forecasts came from the forecasters that the mountain rescue used. The MRT on Skye tell you who these are on their website. Maybe the Llanberis MRT do the same.
I follow quite a few 'amateur' meteorologists for their winter forecasts and more often than not they're quite wrong. It's still fun to read about, and indeed educational. But long range forecasting is reliably unreliable, even the authentic big guns get it wrong most of the time. Such is the nature of the science, we just don't understand it enough.
Its the ' butterfly effect'. Long range forecasts are based on past records...but there are changes in the climate now which means past records dont count as they did.
Indeed. Like I said, we don't know enough.
The Met Office...it's really rather good
> The Met Office...it's really rather good
I have found that there is a big difference in wind gust strength forecasts between the Met and BBC. Take yesterday, BBC weather saying 60mph gusts in Skye, Met was 49mph. The bridge was closed to high sided vehicles for a while and I think that kicks in at 50mph.
I also think the Met app is shockingly bad.
I swear by Lucy Verasamy. It’s always sunny when Lucy’s on.
I've used netweather to see what is blowing in
https://www.netweather.tv/live-weather/radar
and minutecast on AccuWeather.
AccuWeather now has a future weather radar map (forecast). Not seen that before and something I've wanted for ages.
MWIS. It won’t be any worse than what they say.
> MWIS. It won’t be any worse than what they say.
If you only used MWIS you’d get out twice a year at most!
> If you only used MWIS you’d get out twice a year at most!
Haha! It is always on the pessimistic side!
I tend to use MWIS and yr.no, and it’s usually somewhen in between those two.
Does seem to be the case! I’ve recently switched to Meteoblue; not because their forecast is any better per-se, but because they have a nice page that shows you all the model outputs on a graph so saves looking a 3/4 sites. Requires a bit of a critical eye for data mind.
Can you provide a link to the model output, please? I can't seem to find anything resembling that on the Meteoblue site, but no doubt am looking in the wrong place!
If you want to fully weather geek, then this is a must:
Their Phone app mirrors this.
On the website if you select forecast in the left hand menu you get a drop down with links to the multi model meteograms. Only works per location rather than in space mind.
Have you seen wxcharts.eu? It allows you to view charts of lots of different models with lots of different overlays. You can also click on a location and get more graphical displays, although for less models. For the more meteorologically advanced it also displays ensembles and skew-Ts, only in GFS so quite a course model but still handy.
Another handy feature is if you click on the model run time and hit space bar you can jump between model runs to get an idea of consistency.
It depends on what exactly you mean by long range, but you're right, most forecasts have some climatological built into them to try and keep the forecast within plausible limits. This helps to filter out the more extreme forecast outputs, but it does have the down side that more extreme outputs are very occasionally right!
Depending what your looking at most medium to long range forecasts will be model driven, but can have some skill applied, such as looking at things called teleconnects, basically global weather that can have an influence on our weather a few weeks down the line. A couple of the more commonly known of these are the Northern Atlantic Oscillation (negative phase gives a higher chance of cold dry weather) and sudden stratospheric warming which can increase the chance of cold easterlies across the UK two or three weeks later.
That said, they still come with large amounts of uncertainty.
Got it. Thanks!
https://www.meteoblue.com/en/weather/forecast/multimodel/upper-hulme_united...
love it.
> I have found that there is a big difference in wind gust strength forecasts between the Met and BBC. Take yesterday, BBC weather saying 60mph gusts in Skye, Met was 49mph.
I'm not sure what you are concerned about here, wind gusts are very chaotic and you could easily see a max gust of 45mph in one location and 60mph in another location less than a mile away, even in flat lands, even more so in hilly areas.