In reply to magma:
It's my belief from the available footage that most of that mass shown in that video's timelapse had already been deposited onto the glacier gradually days before it's collapse.
In other words, the vlogger seems to me to be conflating (perhaps deliberately) timelapses from a week ago (of a slope which now had already slipped and loaded the glacier until its collapse on thursday). Of course, I'd have to re‑check all the actual historic footage against the post‑slide ones, but I remember enough of them that I can state that with high confidence.
I'd rather keep to official and scientific sources like Dave Petley's (Vice-Chancellor of the University of Hull) highly informative and scientific blog than some utter teenage rando's youtube channel...
https://eos.org/landslide-blog
This is before the collapse, you can see most of the rock mass initially on the move had already collapsed and loaded the glacier below:
https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:7tatft4f2j4pcpq2653f637f
Also, from the latest coverage I have seen, the authorities are now most concerned (apart from the GLOF) about the runout mass on the opposite valley side to the crown, which narrowly missed a hamlet there, as it might have been deposited on an already steep slope of the 12,000 year old morraine (which might have actually saved the upper hamlet) with quite some force and not be in a stable configuration. That's not to say there won't be some rockfall from the original crown of the rockslide in the days to come, but it should be much smaller.
Post edited at 20:04