Nanga Parbat - The Fury Continues

© Salewa
A still shot from the new and highly controversial film 'Nanga Parbat'.  © Salewa
A still shot from the new and highly controversial film 'Nanga Parbat'.
© Salewa

Nanga Parbat Film Renews Friction Between Legendary Climbers

The newly released film 'Nanga Parbat' has reignited a blazing feud surrounding the death of Günther Messner.

The film, a portrayal of the 1970 climb of the infamous Rupal Face on the giant Himalayan peak of Nanga Parbat, has come under widespread criticism for its defamatory characterisation of several now dead expedition members.

"To put it succinctly, the film is simply poor." commented Steffen Kern of the German climbing magazine and website

Steffen refers not only to the quality of the acting, but of the overall ethical stance of the film. There has long been bitter contention over the truth behind the chain of events that led to the death of Günther Messner after he and his brother Reinhold's ground-breaking ascent of Nanga Parbat.

World famous climber Reinhold Messner has always maintained that Günther was killed in an avalanche whilst they descended the Diamir face on the Western side of the mountain, but Reinhold's critics have often levelled the accusation that he abandoned his altitude-sick brother high on the mountain.

Several books were published by other members of the ill-fated expedition which were highly critical of Messner's actions. Messner described the revelations from his former climbing partners as "made up to sell books". He then felt compelled to respond with his own book, Naked Mountain, which he wrote to set the record straight.

Regardless of which turn of events was the actual happening, this new film, which openly markets itself as being the story told by Reinhold, has been taken as a direct insult to deceased members of the expedition, as well as being labelled factually incorrect.

Gerhard Baur, a surviving member of the expedition, told the German website Spiegel that "It is a constructed story, and is not the truth about Nanga Parbat ... it is presented as if it were a documentary when it doesn't reflect the facts..."

Steffen Kern's main objection to the film is the crass misrepresentation of several of the deceased expedition members, including a scene where they are shown to rejoice when they suspect that the Messner brothers are dead.

Reinhold Messner, the now legendary climber whose character stars in the film, survived the Nanga Parbat climb, his first major Himalayan route, and the ensuing aftermath, and went on to become one of the World's most successful mountaineers with an unparalleled CV in high altitude climbing. Crowning moments include the first ascent of Everest without supplementary oxygen, and becoming the first person to complete all 14 8000m peaks.

Messner says on the German magazine and website that the film was a collaboration between him and the director Joseph Vilsmaier and that the pair had formed a strong bond whilst making Nanga Parbat.

"I am in total agreement with Joseph Vilsmaier - the best film scripts are written by real life. All we need to do is recount what has happened to arouse strong emotions in the viewer." commented Messner.

Other people involved with the ascent don't agree that this film does recount what happened and it is regarded by many as more fiction than fact. Klaus Herrligkoffer, the expedition leader's son, failed to recognise his own father due to him being cast as a "tyrant using unspeakable Nazi rhetoric" as described by Kern in his damning review of the film.

Quoted in the Guardian, Herrligkoffer stated "I don't recognise my father as he's been portrayed in the film, and because he's dead he cannot defend himself."

Can any mountaineering incident and consequential emotional backlash justify the outright defamation of the dead? Or has Reinhold Messner finally spilled the beans on what actually happened on Nanga Parbat?

This post has been read 19,569 times

Return to Latest News

Support UKC

As climbers we strive to make UKClimbing the kind of website we would love to visit, with the most up-to-date news, diverse and interesting articles, comprehensive gear reviews, breathtaking photographs and a vast and useful logbook system. As a result, an incredible community has formed around the site - we’ve provided the framework but it’s you who make the website what it is today. If you appreciate the content we offer then you can help us by becoming an official UKC Supporter. This can be a one-off single annual payment or a more substantial payment paid monthly or yearly which includes full access to Rockfax Digital and discounts on Rockfax print publications.

If you appreciate UKClimbing then please help us by becoming a UKC Supporter.

UKC Supporter

  • Support the website we all know and love
  • Access to a year's subscription to Rockfax Digital.
  • Plus 30% off Rockfax guidebooks
  • Plus Show your support - UKC Supporter badge on your profile and forum posts
UKC/UKH/Rockfax logo

11 Feb, 2010
There is no such thing as bad publicity
11 Feb, 2010
Havent seen the film or know much about the story, but if the accusations are true, then I think Messner should just have aged gracefully...
11 Feb, 2010
I think when it got to the point that the chick bivvied out next to ol' Kurz I stopped worrying about that films accurate portrayal of anything...
11 Feb, 2010
I saw this film about 3 weeks ago with my girlfriend, in the original German. She wasn't previously aware of the story of the Messners on Nanga Parbat, and I tried to explain on the way to the cinema, but she was still left baffled by what actually went on in the film. I don't think the problem was that it was too technical on the climbing side, I just don't think it was any more than average, as a film. In fact, she came out of the cinema saying how she actually felt more sympathy for Herrligkoffer, than Messner, and asking why Messner had been so arrogant on the mountain. All this despite it being Messner's own side of the story. Perhaps that just means that he can't see where he's gone wrong, and sees his behaviour and attitude as completely justified. Regardless of the accuracy of the story, (and we'll never have a proper answer as to the rights and wrongs of it) Messner doesn't come across well, and indeed the film as a whole will not go down as one of the greats of mountain films. I agree wholeheartedly with the review linked, and would suggest it's worth a read before you go and see the film! Tim
12 Feb, 2010
So we have a really badly made and badly acted film, recounting an already murky and much-debated story involving a whole host of 'large personalities'. It's not really going to show anyone in a good light that, and it's certainly not going to shed any light on the truth of events.
More Comments
Loading Notifications...
Facebook Twitter Copy Email