In reply to drunken monkey:
Getting rid of the Nimrod was a stupid idea, because we haven't got anything that can fulfill that capability. As usual, the government were looking at numbers and not the bigger picture. I think they thought that because the cold war is over, we don't need submarine hunters anymore, so why not bin them.
What they failed to do is look at all the other things that the Nimrod did, like SAR top cover, anti drug trafficking work in the Caribbean and of course it would be great for anti-piracy in the Gulf of Aden.
Of course, there was no need to spend that much money on the Nimrod project and people just look at the numbers and are shocked. We could have purchased some P3 Orions for a fraction of the cost. The thing with military procurement is that it's not always about getting the cheapest price, but also about supporting British industry and creating employment.