In reply to Phill Mitch:
> (In reply to ksjs) I feel I have just had a ticking off from you.
I wasn't at my most positive when I wrote that - sorry! Also, I'm sure I'm not right in everything I say but I guess it feels true for me.
The whole Kalymnos thing gets to me a bit - a large percentage of the grades simply aren't at their grade and it doesn't really help anyone who's trying to progress their climbing in some sort of systematic way. Fun yes, a great climbing holiday place yes, some amazing routes yes but a benchmark of where you're climbing is at no. At least that's what I reckon. Anyway, Kalymnos rant over.
I think it's so easy not be honest about why you're not achieving something in climbing (assuming we're talking here about grade progression being an achievement, there are obviously many other forms of enjoyment / achievement in climbing) that you have to be pretty rigorous in seeking the real reasons. Again, maybe I over-labour this point.
You say you only get out every few weeks, are you getting indoors in between times? If no that's not enough. 3* classics are great but looking at your logbook you should be aiming for E3s on a regular basis and including more 6a stuff in there - bouldering will help immensely with trad cruxes. Perhaps there is a bit of an excuse in there or rather not an excuse just bad tactics i.e. I want to improve but I'm sticking with classics within my grade?
As with most things it is a bit of a balance however and, if it's winter, and you want to enjoy limited days out then getting on stuff you're really keen for is great.
Apologies for any criticisms, none intended, just an effort to spark some good self-questioning.