In reply to EeeByGum:
> Because if you sit a class full of kids in front of a PC with the task of researching the Romans, 70% will instantly log onto Facebook, 20% will end up looking at Trip Advisor pages for hotels in Rome and the other 10% might be able to find some vaguely useful but irrelevant pages on the Romans. And there is the nub. There is so much information at your finger tips that getting an overview is often very difficult.
Which is precisely why a good teacher wouldn't just set them loose on the computers with an instruction as vague as "research the Romans". Incidentally, almost every school in the country will have Facebook (and other social networking sites) completely blocked.
> Teaching kids to filter this information is kind of irrelevant when at the end of the day the goal is to learn a specific subject.
I think this is the root of your issue with IT, you seem to have a very narrow view of the purpose of education. It comes back to the old classic student line of "when am I ever going to need to know this, sir?". Though a teacher would never say it, the answer in a lot of cases would probably be "never (in a direct and literal sense)". The cognitive skills and the practice in how to actually learn something are at least as important as a lot of the actual information that is imparted in schools.
> <old fuddy duddy alert>The premise "kids are technology savy therefore we must use technology in order for them to learn efficiently" doesn't wash with me I am afraid.</fuddy duddy>
<pedantry>Your tags don't match</pedantry>
I don't actually think that is the premise, generally. I think it could better be stated as "technology is ubiquitous in the modern world and modern workplaces, so students must leave schools with the ability to use and apply technology in as wide a range of contexts as possible".