In reply to Toerag:
It's not entirely true that hammers are necessary, a screw-auger type device could be driven in to depth with a long relatively lightweight tommy-bar.
OP: the problem you have as I see it is that steep earth cliff tops are not one thing with one right solution, even the brute force big stake and a bigger hammer falls short of ideal in dry sandy soil or where large rocks prevent it being driven to any depth. Soil consolidated with vegetation can seem secure but shear off in matts under little load where the shallow roots end. Often the soil itself is just a thin poorly attached and consolidated skin over loose scree. Blade type devices like a deadman will struggle to penetrate pebbly soil or matted vegetation. Short stakes, especially in typically poor cliff top soil have very limited holding power.
Something like the DMM product linked above is probably approaching the best practical compromise but it isn't 'climbing kit' by any stretch of the imagination, nor is it really adequate or reassuring as an ab anchor.
Many of my climbing years have been spent on and around grass topped sea cliffs and I think it unlikely you will imagine something that would persuade me to part with money then lug it around on the off chance it may prove useful. IMO it's one of those environments where a bit of prior thought and prep is better than a might-work technical solution. Still, if the ultimate aim of the project is a technical paper rather than a commercial product it could be an interesting challenge.
edit: I wonder if some sort of self-placing stake driven by a disposable energy source like a small CO2 cylinder could be a practical proposition. Having moving parts it's never going to be cheap and to offset the weight of the hammer action the body would have to be pretty exotic, composite or Ti probably. Then there's extracting it... A screw is probably still better and simpler.
jk
Post edited at 14:48