In reply to Simon4:
> I could just about agree that the Lenzspitze might be questionable, just due to the vertical interval, though it is clearly a separate peak due to its situation. Surely Nordend qualifies by any reasonable criteria? >
It depends how you define 'reasonable' I suppose. Situation can make some summits seem more worthy but its still very subjective.
The Nordend doesn't qualify if 100m height separation is the criteria, its only 94m and the Bishorn falls short by even less at 95m (Lenzspitze is 86m). I suppose any criteria produce 'hard cases' but it still seems less arbitrary than all the other lists which seem to include or omit various bumps like Pic Eccles, Punta Baretti etc according to whether the author feels like it.
Still, there's no reason why we can't the Norend, Bishorn and Lenzspitze even if they don't qualify